-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
CI: Add job to test OBS package generation #480
Comments
@jcvenegas - agreed. I think this is the "other side" of kata-containers/ci#10. |
@jodh-intel yeah it should be used by this automation. |
The most appropriate way would be:
|
I am gently bumping this, given the abundance of bug and side effect (at least) I have introduced. @jcvenegas we should schedule some time to complete this. |
Agree, I personally feel better to track the work on github but not OBS. Because in that way we dont force kata contributors create a OBS account. One approach would be create a job that builds kata packages and then test in some distros. The bad part of this is the time to have the packages ready in a good day packages get ready in 40minutes. Not that build is quick but wait until the packages are published take some time. I dont know if we can use the osc client to download the packages built - or check the time that takes to build locally with osc client. |
Add simple yaml definition to run job in azure pipelines. Fixes: #480 Signed-off-by: Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz <jose.carlos.venegas.munoz@intel.com>
Add simple yaml definition to run job in azure pipelines. Fixes: #480 Signed-off-by: Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz <jose.carlos.venegas.munoz@intel.com>
Add simple yaml definition to run job in azure pipelines. - The pipeline should be triggerd with comments when is a PR Fixes: #480 Signed-off-by: Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz <jose.carlos.venegas.munoz@intel.com>
To avoid break packages generation on release we should build the packages on packaging changes.
We should find a way to build locally (if time not take a lot) or push a branch in OBS and wait until all is build then test the packages generated.
\cc @marcov @ganeshmaharaj @jodh-intel @grahamwhaley @egernst
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: