Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 12, 2021. It is now read-only.

travis: Add support for ppc64le #93

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2018
Merged

Conversation

nitkon
Copy link
Contributor

@nitkon nitkon commented Jun 26, 2018

Fixes #92

Signed-off-by: Nitesh Konkar niteshkonkar@in.ibm.com

Fixes kata-containers#92

Signed-off-by: Nitesh Konkar <niteshkonkar@in.ibm.com>
@jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor

jodh-intel commented Jun 26, 2018

lgtm!

Approved with PullApprove

@jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

@grahamwhaley grahamwhaley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm
looking forward to seeing it wired up :-)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 26, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #93 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #93   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.42%   53.42%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         277      277           
=======================================
  Hits          148      148           
  Misses        116      116           
  Partials       13       13

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1e52c95...a87ddf2. Read the comment docs.

@nitkon
Copy link
Contributor Author

nitkon commented Jun 26, 2018

@jodh-intel @grahamwhaley : Thanks for the review. Let me take a look at the links you pointed out.
Paralley, I was planning to enable other components travis on ppc64le as well.

@amshinde amshinde merged commit 5296eda into kata-containers:master Jun 26, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants