Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define Proper Controller Author Behavior re: Connection URLs #1339

Closed
Tracked by #1225
stevekuznetsov opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
Tracked by #1225

Define Proper Controller Author Behavior re: Connection URLs #1339

stevekuznetsov opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
area/sharding Issues or PRs related to sharding changes lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

In some future, a controller will be able to use ThingReplicationClaim to request local copies of data. We expect controller authors in that new world to hold two clients - one against their local cache and another against the shard front-proxy for live lookups and mutations.

Similarly, we have a VirtualWorkspace URL per shard, and perhaps controllers using these will also use ThingReplicationClaim. These controllers, however, cannot use one endpoint for their requests, since *-cluster LIST+WATCH is not easy to mux/demux. We need to determine the proper flows and expectation for controller authors for when the list of URLs changes, etc.

/cc @sttts @ncdc

@sttts sttts added this to kcp Jun 23, 2022
@sttts sttts moved this to New in kcp Jun 23, 2022
@ncdc ncdc added this to the TBD milestone Jun 28, 2022
@ncdc ncdc added the area/sharding Issues or PRs related to sharding changes label Jun 28, 2022
@sttts sttts mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2022
37 tasks
@ncdc ncdc moved this from New to Backlog in kcp Oct 17, 2022
@ncdc ncdc removed this from the TBD milestone Oct 17, 2022
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
After a furter 30 days, they will turn rotten.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 13, 2024
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 13, 2024
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@kcp-ci-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in kcp Jun 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/sharding Issues or PRs related to sharding changes lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants