Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runs e2e-sharded with two shards #1653

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 4, 2022

Conversation

p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Related issue(s)

Fixes #

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 1, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API label Aug 2, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 2, 2022
@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial force-pushed the run-e2e-with-two-shards branch from 054bae8 to 34c8ec1 Compare August 2, 2022 10:54
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 2, 2022
@sttts
Copy link
Member

sttts commented Aug 2, 2022

unit tests

shardBaseURL string
shardExternalURL string
shardVirtualWorkspaceURL string
externalAddressProvider func() string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you double check: I think in server.go we have a redirect to some external VW URL, maybe including a flag. When @davidfestal removes the personal workspace support, and with your change here, that will probably be not needed anymore very soon.

@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial force-pushed the run-e2e-with-two-shards branch from b3ffe8e to f7bd046 Compare August 4, 2022 12:51
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 4, 2022
@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial changed the title run e2e with two shards runs e2e-sharded with two shards Aug 4, 2022
@sttts
Copy link
Member

sttts commented Aug 4, 2022

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 4, 2022
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 283cb60 into kcp-dev:main Aug 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants