Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

home-ws: wait for tenancy binding readiness #1872

Conversation

ncdc
Copy link
Member

@ncdc ncdc commented Aug 31, 2022

Summary

If the incoming request is in the home workspaces hierarchy and it's for clusterworkspaces, there is a chance the tenancy APIBinding is not yet ready (or the cache is stale). If that is the case, return a retry-after to give the APIBinding cache a
chance to catch up.

Related issue(s)

Fixes #1693

Signed-off-by: Andy Goldstein <andy.goldstein@redhat.com>
@@ -351,6 +378,21 @@ func (h *homeWorkspaceHandler) ServeHTTP(rw http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Reque
http.Error(rw, "Creating the home workspace", http.StatusTooManyRequests)
return
}

if requestInfo.IsResourceRequest && requestInfo.APIGroup == tenancyv1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.Group && requestInfo.Resource == "clusterworkspaces" {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This kind of breaks my brain - can we close over this in searchForWorkspaceAndRBACInLocalInformers? Otherwise the flow here is pretty hard to follow (and we need to discern specifics about what might or might be true based on what some other helper returned)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have the requestInfo in searchForWorkspaceAndRBACInLocalInformers and it would be a huge amount of work to fix all the test cases that would be broken by adding a param to that function. That's why I did it here.

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 31, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: stevekuznetsov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 31, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 658850b into kcp-dev:main Aug 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Home workspace creation failure
3 participants