Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 crdcleanup: strongly type enqueue params #2573

Merged

Conversation

ncdc
Copy link
Member

@ncdc ncdc commented Jan 9, 2023

Summary

Strongly type the params used in our enqueue functions to avoid accidentally enqueueing the wrong kind of object.

Related issue(s)

Fixes #

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from davidfestal and sttts January 9, 2023 20:23
Signed-off-by: Andy Goldstein <andy.goldstein@redhat.com>
@ncdc ncdc force-pushed the strongly-typed-enqueues/crdcleanup branch from 137fe6e to 2b25d26 Compare January 9, 2023 20:30
Copy link
Contributor

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 9, 2023
@@ -80,33 +80,29 @@ func NewController(

crdInformer.Informer().AddEventHandler(cache.FilteringResourceEventHandler{
FilterFunc: func(obj interface{}) bool {
crd, ok := obj.(*apiextensionsv1.CustomResourceDefinition)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically this is a regression in behavior but I think in practice it's the more correct thing to do anyway?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but it's better to panic to indicate programmer error I'd say.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 9, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: stevekuznetsov, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 9, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1f75c0f into kcp-dev:main Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants