Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix the spec.URL in workspace using canonicalPath #2846

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2023

Conversation

qiujian16
Copy link
Contributor

The spec.URL in workspace should use canonicalPath

Summary

The spec.URL of workspace should use canonicalPath instead of absolute path.

Related issue(s)

Fixes #2737

@qiujian16
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold for testing
this is still need to be confirmed whether it is the appropriate approach.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 27, 2023
@ncdc ncdc changed the title 🐛 Fix the spe.URL in workspace using canonicalPath 🐛 Fix the spec.URL in workspace using canonicalPath Feb 27, 2023
The spec.URL in workspace should use canonicalPath

Signed-off-by: Jian Qiu <jqiu@redhat.com>
@qiujian16
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 1, 2023
@ncdc
Copy link
Member

ncdc commented Mar 2, 2023

Code LGTM. @sttts does this violate any tenets for workspace URLs?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 3, 2023
@sttts
Copy link
Member

sttts commented Mar 3, 2023

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 3, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncdc, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 749788f into kcp-dev:main Mar 3, 2023
@qiujian16 qiujian16 deleted the ws-url branch March 4, 2023 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: kcp bind compute does not work as expected for locations on a different workspace
4 participants