btrfs-progs: fix a false failure for inode cache cleanup #890
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kdave
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
[BUG]
There is one report about `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache` failed with
tree block level mismatch:
# btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache /dev/mapper/rootext
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 5
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 257
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 258
corrupt node: root=7 block=647369064448 slot=0, invalid level for leaf, have 1 expect 0
node 647369064448 level 1 items 252 free space 241 generation 6065173 owner CSUM_TREE
node 647369064448 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
fs uuid e6614f01-6f56-4776-8b0a-c260089c35e7
chunk uuid f665f535-4cfd-49e0-8be9-7f94bf59b75d
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 3714473984) block 677126111232 gen 6065002
[...]
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 6192357376) block 646396493824 gen 6065032
ERROR: failed to clear ino cache: Input/output error
[CAUSE]
During `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache`, btrfs-progs will iterate through
all the subvolumes, and clear the inode cache inode from each subvolume.
The problem is in how we iterate the subvolumes.
We hold a path of tree root, and go modifiy the fs for each found
subvolume, then call btrfs_next_item().
This is not safe, because the path to tree root is not longer reliable
if we modified the fs.
So the btrfs_next_item() call will fail because the fs is modified
halfway, resulting the above problem.
[FIX]
Instead of holding a path to a subvolume root item, and modify the fs
halfway, here introduce a helper, find_next_root(), to locate the root
item whose objectid >= our target rootid, and return the found item key.
The path to root tree is only hold then released inside
find_next_root().
By this, we won't hold any unrelated path while modifying the
filesystem.
And since we're here, also adding back the missing new line when all ino
cache is cleared.
Reported-by: Archange <archange@archlinux.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4803f696-2dc5-4987-a353-fce1272e93e7@archlinux.org/
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
adam900710
force-pushed
the
ino_clear_fix
branch
from
9d1f0fa
to
940a0b5
Compare
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
[BUG]
There is one report about `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache` failed with
tree block level mismatch:
# btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache /dev/mapper/rootext
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 5
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 257
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 258
corrupt node: root=7 block=647369064448 slot=0, invalid level for leaf, have 1 expect 0
node 647369064448 level 1 items 252 free space 241 generation 6065173 owner CSUM_TREE
node 647369064448 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
fs uuid e6614f01-6f56-4776-8b0a-c260089c35e7
chunk uuid f665f535-4cfd-49e0-8be9-7f94bf59b75d
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 3714473984) block 677126111232 gen 6065002
[...]
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 6192357376) block 646396493824 gen 6065032
ERROR: failed to clear ino cache: Input/output error
[CAUSE]
During `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache`, btrfs-progs will iterate through
all the subvolumes, and clear the inode cache inode from each subvolume.
The problem is in how we iterate the subvolumes.
We hold a path of tree root, and go modifiy the fs for each found
subvolume, then call btrfs_next_item().
This is not safe, because the path to tree root is not longer reliable
if we modified the fs.
So the btrfs_next_item() call will fail because the fs is modified
halfway, resulting the above problem.
[FIX]
Instead of holding a path to a subvolume root item, and modify the fs
halfway, here introduce a helper, find_next_root(), to locate the root
item whose objectid >= our target rootid, and return the found item key.
The path to root tree is only hold then released inside
find_next_root().
By this, we won't hold any unrelated path while modifying the
filesystem.
And since we're here, also adding back the missing new line when all ino
cache is cleared.
Pull-request: #890
Reported-by: Archange <archange@archlinux.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4803f696-2dc5-4987-a353-fce1272e93e7@archlinux.org/
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
[BUG]
There is one report about `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache` failed with
tree block level mismatch:
# btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache /dev/mapper/rootext
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 5
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 257
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 258
corrupt node: root=7 block=647369064448 slot=0, invalid level for leaf, have 1 expect 0
node 647369064448 level 1 items 252 free space 241 generation 6065173 owner CSUM_TREE
node 647369064448 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
fs uuid e6614f01-6f56-4776-8b0a-c260089c35e7
chunk uuid f665f535-4cfd-49e0-8be9-7f94bf59b75d
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 3714473984) block 677126111232 gen 6065002
[...]
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 6192357376) block 646396493824 gen 6065032
ERROR: failed to clear ino cache: Input/output error
[CAUSE]
During `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache`, btrfs-progs will iterate through
all the subvolumes, and clear the inode cache inode from each subvolume.
The problem is in how we iterate the subvolumes.
We hold a path of tree root, and go modifiy the fs for each found
subvolume, then call btrfs_next_item().
This is not safe, because the path to tree root is not longer reliable
if we modified the fs.
So the btrfs_next_item() call will fail because the fs is modified
halfway, resulting the above problem.
[FIX]
Instead of holding a path to a subvolume root item, and modify the fs
halfway, here introduce a helper, find_next_root(), to locate the root
item whose objectid >= our target rootid, and return the found item key.
The path to root tree is only hold then released inside
find_next_root().
By this, we won't hold any unrelated path while modifying the
filesystem.
And since we're here, also adding back the missing new line when all ino
cache is cleared.
Pull-request: #890
Reported-by: Archange <archange@archlinux.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4803f696-2dc5-4987-a353-fce1272e93e7@archlinux.org/
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2024
[BUG]
There is one report about `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache` failed with
tree block level mismatch:
# btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache /dev/mapper/rootext
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 5
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 257
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 258
corrupt node: root=7 block=647369064448 slot=0, invalid level for leaf, have 1 expect 0
node 647369064448 level 1 items 252 free space 241 generation 6065173 owner CSUM_TREE
node 647369064448 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
fs uuid e6614f01-6f56-4776-8b0a-c260089c35e7
chunk uuid f665f535-4cfd-49e0-8be9-7f94bf59b75d
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 3714473984) block 677126111232 gen 6065002
[...]
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 6192357376) block 646396493824 gen 6065032
ERROR: failed to clear ino cache: Input/output error
[CAUSE]
During `btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache`, btrfs-progs will iterate through
all the subvolumes, and clear the inode cache inode from each subvolume.
The problem is in how we iterate the subvolumes.
We hold a path of tree root, and go modifiy the fs for each found
subvolume, then call btrfs_next_item().
This is not safe, because the path to tree root is not longer reliable
if we modified the fs.
So the btrfs_next_item() call will fail because the fs is modified
halfway, resulting the above problem.
[FIX]
Instead of holding a path to a subvolume root item, and modify the fs
halfway, here introduce a helper, find_next_root(), to locate the root
item whose objectid >= our target rootid, and return the found item key.
The path to root tree is only hold then released inside
find_next_root().
By this, we won't hold any unrelated path while modifying the
filesystem.
And since we're here, also adding back the missing new line when all ino
cache is cleared.
Pull-request: #890
Reported-by: Archange <archange@archlinux.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4803f696-2dc5-4987-a353-fce1272e93e7@archlinux.org/
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[BUG]
There is one report about
btrfs rescue clear-ino-cachefailed with tree block level mismatch:btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache /dev/mapper/rootext
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 5
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 257
Successfully cleaned up ino cache for root id: 258
corrupt node: root=7 block=647369064448 slot=0, invalid level for leaf, have 1 expect 0
node 647369064448 level 1 items 252 free space 241 generation 6065173 owner CSUM_TREE
node 647369064448 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
fs uuid e6614f01-6f56-4776-8b0a-c260089c35e7
chunk uuid f665f535-4cfd-49e0-8be9-7f94bf59b75d
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 3714473984) block 677126111232 gen 6065002
[...]
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 6192357376) block 646396493824 gen 6065032
ERROR: failed to clear ino cache: Input/output error
[CAUSE]
During
btrfs rescue clear-ino-cache, btrfs-progs will iterate through all the subvolumes, and clear the inode cache inode from each subvolume.The problem is in how we iterate the subvolumes.
We hold a path of tree root, and go modifiy the fs for each found subvolume, then call btrfs_next_item().
This is not safe, because the path to tree root is not longer reliable if we modified the fs.
So the btrfs_next_item() call will fail because the fs is modified halfway, resulting the above problem.
[FIX]
Instead of holding a path to a subvolume root item, and modify the fs halfway, here introduce a helper, find_next_root(), to locate the root item whose objectid >= our target rootid, and return the found item key.
The path to root tree is only hold then released inside find_next_root().
By this, we won't hold any unrelated path while modifying the filesystem.
And since we're here, also adding back the missing new line when all ino cache is cleared.
Reported-by: Archange archange@archlinux.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4803f696-2dc5-4987-a353-fce1272e93e7@archlinux.org/