Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: use safe securityContext as default #267
feat: use safe securityContext as default #267
Changes from all commits
36b5c1b
5e97b36
53e886f
63a812c
c6b36a7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @JorTurFer , I wonder why do you flip the logical meaning of
securityContext
andpodSecurityContext
Helm values?Previously
securityContext
was mapped tocontainer.securityContext
, andpodSecurityContext
was mapped to pod-levelsecurityContext
. So the naming seemed to be correct.Now it's flipped vice versa. Would it cause any backward compatibility issues for users that were previously passing custom
securityContext
andpodSecurityContext
values to KEDA Helm chart?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lol, you are right!
I confused them 🤦 till now I have been thinking in podSecurityContext as containerSecurityContext...
are you willing to contribute solving this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd be glad to help but I don't think I can do it quickly. I still have PR for #261 on my to-do list but never have time :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't worry, I will do it tomorrow with the chart release :)
Nice catch!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @JorTurFer !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#274