Compatibility/Support Matrix Update #1774
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ravi-kumar-pilla <ravi_kumar_pilla@mckinsey.com>
Signed-off-by: ravi-kumar-pilla <ravi_kumar_pilla@mckinsey.com>
Signed-off-by: ravi-kumar-pilla <ravi_kumar_pilla@mckinsey.com>
Signed-off-by: ravi-kumar-pilla <ravi_kumar_pilla@mckinsey.com>
ravi-kumar-pilla
requested review from
rashidakanchwala and
NeroOkwa
as code owners
README.md
Outdated
| </tr> | ||
| <tr> | ||
| <td>>= 3.9</td> | ||
| <td>Active</td> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was a little confused by Active. Should we say Current ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a support matrix which suggests we have active support, so I named Active. But I am also not sure if we should remove the compatibility matrix we had earlier. Any suggestions on this ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can rename to Current as well, I do not have a strong opinion on keeping it as Active
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, because they are all versions in the matrix, when it says 'Active' it doesn't hit me immediately what is 'Active' versions but I know what 'Current' version is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
but otherwise I am fine :) thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I renamed Active to Latest. thanks 👍
|
Thanks @ravi-kumar-pilla , this matrix is definitely way more clearer and with the breaking changes we had recently. I think it's best way to showcase. |
Signed-off-by: ravi-kumar-pilla <ravi_kumar_pilla@mckinsey.com>
Description
Resolves #1758
Development notes
QA notes
Checklist
RELEASE.mdfile