Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include new libraries at requirements.txt in spaceflights tutorial tutorial_template.md #3118

Conversation

laizaparizotto
Copy link
Contributor

@laizaparizotto laizaparizotto commented Oct 4, 2023

Description

Sorry, here is the corrected version from PR #3117.

I saw the new issue #3111 proposed by @merelcht about updating tutorials documentation and I decided to run the tutorial to verify if there was something missing in the documentation.

I was able to follow the steps and successfully complete the tutorial. Only thing I notice is that the requirements.txt have more libraries now, so I decided to update that with the current requirements.txt file I got.

Development notes

Checklist

  • Read the contributing guidelines
  • Signed off each commit with a Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO)
  • Opened this PR as a 'Draft Pull Request' if it is work-in-progress
  • Updated the documentation to reflect the code changes
  • Added a description of this change in the RELEASE.md file
  • Added tests to cover my changes
  • Checked if this change will affect Kedro-Viz, and if so, communicated that with the Viz team

@ankatiyar ankatiyar added the Community Issue/PR opened by the open-source community label Oct 6, 2023
laizaparizotto and others added 2 commits October 9, 2023 08:06
I just ran the spaceflight tutorial and this part of the documentation seems to be outdated. Only small detail.

Signed-off-by: Laiza Parizotto <laizamsparizotto@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ankita Katiyar <110245118+ankatiyar@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Laiza Parizotto <laizamsparizotto@gmail.com>
@laizaparizotto laizaparizotto force-pushed the update_spaceflights_documentation_take_2 branch from 1551c46 to 492601e Compare October 9, 2023 06:07
@laizaparizotto laizaparizotto force-pushed the update_spaceflights_documentation_take_2 branch from 0d2c63d to f257c35 Compare October 9, 2023 06:18
@merelcht
Copy link
Member

merelcht commented Oct 9, 2023

The spaceflights tutorial has recently been updated to use ruff and some other dependencies were removed. Can you double check that the docs and https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro-starters/blob/main/spaceflights/%7B%7B%20cookiecutter.repo_name%20%7D%7D/src/requirements.txt are in sync?

@laizaparizotto laizaparizotto force-pushed the update_spaceflights_documentation_take_2 branch from a888e10 to 9b70c77 Compare October 9, 2023 15:17
@laizaparizotto
Copy link
Contributor Author

@merelcht Indeed the corrections from this PR were not matching that link.

They are now :D

Copy link
Member

@merelcht merelcht left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left one more suggestion, but otherwise this looks good! Thanks for the contribution @laizaparizotto

docs/source/tutorial/tutorial_template.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Merel Theisen <49397448+merelcht@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Laiza Parizotto <laizamsparizotto@gmail.com>
@laizaparizotto laizaparizotto force-pushed the update_spaceflights_documentation_take_2 branch from 8291492 to 6f7bf89 Compare October 9, 2023 21:15
@laizaparizotto
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @merelcht

@merelcht merelcht requested review from ankatiyar and removed request for astrojuanlu, stichbury and yetudada October 10, 2023 08:35
Copy link
Contributor

@stichbury stichbury left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for improving our spaceflights project yet again @laizaparizotto 🌟

@merelcht merelcht merged commit f7b2548 into kedro-org:main Oct 10, 2023
29 of 38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Community Issue/PR opened by the open-source community
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants