added is_query to handle estimate fee

[apoorvsadana]

Pull Request type

Please add the labels corresponding to the type of changes your PR introduces:

• Bugfix
• Feature

What is the current behavior?

Estimate fee with version 0x100000000000000000000000000000001 doesn't work. Starknet-rs has added support for it and this PR integrates it.

Resolves: #646

What is the new behavior?

• Estimate fee works correctly now
• Once dev/query_tx_version is merged in starknet-rs, I will update the packages in this PR and we can merge

Does this introduce a breaking change?

No

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 81.08% and project coverage change: +0.08 🎉

Comparison is base (9db8569) 41.74% compared to head (5a8b447) 41.83%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #866      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.74%   41.83%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          86       86              
  Lines       10689    10717      +28     
  Branches    10689    10717      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits         4462     4483      +21     
- Misses       5661     5668       +7     
  Partials      566      566              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...rates/primitives/starknet/src/transaction/utils.rs	30.43% <70.00%> (+30.43%)	⬆️
crates/primitives/starknet/src/transaction/mod.rs	81.52% <71.42%> (-0.30%)	⬇️
...rates/primitives/starknet/src/transaction/types.rs	40.21% <75.00%> (+0.62%)	⬆️
crates/client/rpc-core/src/tests.rs	95.91% <100.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
crates/client/rpc-core/src/utils.rs	66.54% <100.00%> (+0.25%)	⬆️
...s/primitives/starknet/src/crypto/commitment/mod.rs	92.77% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[EvolveArt]

would probably remove calculate_transaction_version_from_u8 and add TransactionVersion::ONE, TransactionVersion::ZERO

[EvolveArt]

lgtm