-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KPXC doesn't honor ConfirmAccessItem in [FdoSecrets] when it cannot find the executable path #9255
Comments
Can this be consider a bug? |
I think this checkbox is just broken in general. I see the same behavior with the Arch Linux packaged version. Also #7623 (comment) |
Same for me, looks like this checkbox does not work at all regardless of the "executable path". |
@droidmonkey it seems that multiple users are affected by this bug, which makes me understand that the issue is not related to my setup. Might you share your point of view on this? Thanks |
Looks like this patch fixes |
…own with option ConfirmAccessItem=true
I initially reported this issue to flathub/org.keepassxc.KeePassXC#109, but maybe this place is more appropriate as the behave seems to be related to KPXC in general and not to its flatpaked version.
The problem of fingerprinting short-live processes was lengthy discussed #7571 and #6458. The quickest workaround is to set
ConfirmAccessItem=false
under[FdoSecrets]
to revert to 2.6.x behavior.KPXC does not honor the
ConfirmAccessItem
option and keep showing the following dialog every time Nextcloud-client starts, even though I haveConfirmAccessItem=false
Please note that I'm using KPXC installed via flatpak and nextcloud-client too. My best guess is that KPXC has no visibility over the nextcloud binary because it's from another flatpak container.
Acceptance criteria
When
ConfirmAccessItem
is set tofalse
KPXC shouldn't show the "Requesting access" dialog, regardless if it can access the client binary or not.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: