s390/bpf: fix typo in comment #494
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Master branch: c272e25 |
|
Master branch: a56672f |
Spelling mistake (triple letters) in comment. Detected with the help of Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/643878=>bpf-next
branch
from
fa089d1 to
71454f3
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=643878 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, I moved btf_put() after map->ops->map_free() to ensure struct_metas available during map_free(). Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, I moved btf_put() after btf_record_free() to ensure struct_metas available during map_free(). Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, I moved btf_put() after btf_record_free() to ensure struct_metas available during map_free(). Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, let us increase the reference count for btf so it won't be prematurely freed by btf_put() in bpf_map_free(). The same strategy has been used by kptrs, and this patch did similar things for graph node (list_head and rb_root). Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, let us increase the reference count for btf so it won't be prematurely freed by btf_put() in bpf_map_free(). The same strategy has been used by kptrs, and this patch did similar things for graph node (list_head and rb_root). Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. It is also unnecessary to take a reference since the value_rec is referring to a record in struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. It is also unnecessary to take a reference since the value_rec is referring to a record in struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. It is also unnecessary to take a reference since the value_rec is referring to a record in struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. It is also unnecessary to take a reference since the value_rec is referring to a record in struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ To fix the problem, we need to have a reference on btf in order to safeguard accessing field->graph_root.value_rec in map->ops->map_free(). The function btf_parse_graph_root() is the place to get a btf reference. The following are rough call stacks reaching bpf_parse_graph_root(): btf_parse ... btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root map_check_btf btf_parse_fields ... btf_parse_graph_root Looking at the above call stack, the btf_parse_graph_root() is indirectly called from btf_parse() or map_check_btf(). We cannot take a reference in btf_parse() case since at that moment, btf is still in the middle to self-validation and initial reference (refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1)) has not been triggered yet. But even if refcount_set() is moved earlier, taking reference will have other issues at btf_put() stage. btf_put <== to start destruction process unless refcount == 0 ... btf_record_free <== in which if graph_root, a btf reference will be hold <== reference is taken during btf_parse() In order to free the reference taken during btf_parse(), we need to have refcount 0 in btf_put(), but this is impossible since we need to free the reference taken during btf_parse() in order to get refcount 0 for btf_put(). So the end result is btf_put() will not be able to free btf-related memories and we have memory leak here. Luckily, there is no need to take a btf reference during btf_parse() since eventually graph_root.value_rec will refer to the rec in btf struct_meta_tab. But we do need to take a reference for map_check_btf() case as the value_rec refers to a record in struct_meta_tab and we want to make sure btf is not freed until value_rec usage at map_free is done. So the fix is to get a btf reference for map_check_btf() case whenever a graph_root is found. A boolean field 'has_btf_ref' is added to struct btf_field_graph_root so later the btf reference can be properly released. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206110625.3188975-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao<houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ Hao also provided test cases ([1]) for easily reproducing the above issue. There are two ways to fix the issue, the v1 of the patch ([2]) moving btf_put() after map_free callback, and the v5 of the patch ([3]) using a kptr style fix which tries to get a btf reference during map_check_btf(). Each approach has its pro and cons. The first approach delays freeing btf while the second approach needs to acquire reference depending on context which makes logic not very elegant and may complicate things with future new data structures. Alexei suggested in [4] going back to v1 which is what this patch tries to do. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error for the above rb_root test cases. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207141500.917136-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ [2] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204173946.3066377-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ [3] v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208041621.2968241-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ [4] v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ3FiXUhZJwX_81sjZvSYYKCFB3BT6P8D59RS2Gu+0Z7g@mail.gmail.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] <TASK> [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.204913] </TASK> [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>: ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9> 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198> 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8> <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d> So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ Hao also provided test cases ([1]) for easily reproducing the above issue. There are two ways to fix the issue, the v1 of the patch ([2]) moving btf_put() after map_free callback, and the v5 of the patch ([3]) using a kptr style fix which tries to get a btf reference during map_check_btf(). Each approach has its pro and cons. The first approach delays freeing btf while the second approach needs to acquire reference depending on context which makes logic not very elegant and may complicate things with future new data structures. Alexei suggested in [4] going back to v1 which is what this patch tries to do. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error for the above rb_root test cases. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207141500.917136-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ [2] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204173946.3066377-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ [3] v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208041621.2968241-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ [4] v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ3FiXUhZJwX_81sjZvSYYKCFB3BT6P8D59RS2Gu+0Z7g@mail.gmail.com/ Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Fixes: 958cf2e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214203815.1469107-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: s390/bpf: fix typo in comment
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=643878