Fix search filters and add support to search by relationships in the list view #9401
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dcousens
changed the title
dcousens
commented
Nov 19, 2024
dcousens
force-pushed
the
patch-2
branch
3 times, most recently
from
d3d62e8
to
2d7755e
Compare
dcousens
force-pushed
the
patch-2
branch
4 times, most recently
from
9bcaf16
to
7b27d5b
Compare
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 03ab82f:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request fixes the search functionality in the AdminUI by ensuring that the
listconfiguration forui.listView.searchFieldsis used when searching relationship fields within the list view, and in the relationship field field view.This work builds on #8966 which was started by @pnodet and is therefore jointly attributed.