Update docker-compose.yml #1
Conversation
Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to both the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Docker
participant PCMService
User->>Docker: Pull image ghcr.io/khulnasoft/pcm:latest
Docker->>PCMService: Start PCM service with new image
PCMService-->>Docker: Service running
Warning Rate limit exceeded@NxPKG has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR updates the Docker Compose configuration by changing the image source for the pcm service from Intel's GitHub Container Registry to Khulnasoft's GitHub Container Registry while maintaining the same service configuration. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @NxPKG - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please provide information about why this change from Intel's official repository to Khulnasoft's repository is necessary, and document any differences between these images.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/docker.yml (1)
66-67: Consider adding versioned tags alongside :latestWhile the image source change from
inteltokhulnasoftaligns with the PR objectives, relying solely on the:latesttag can lead to reproducibility issues. Consider adding versioned tags (e.g., using git SHA or release version) alongside:latest.tags: | ghcr.io/khulnasoft/pcm:latest + ghcr.io/khulnasoft/pcm:${{ github.sha }} opcm/pcm:latest + opcm/pcm:${{ github.sha }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/docker.yml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/docker.yml (2)
66-67: Verify push permissions for new image locations
Ensure that:
- The workflow has proper permissions to push to
ghcr.io/khulnasoft - The DockerHub credentials have access to push to the
opcmorganization
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Docker workflow configuration for authentication details.
Docker image push permissions are properly configured
The workflow has the necessary authentication configured for both registries:
- GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io): Uses
GITHUB_TOKENwith properpackages: writepermission - DockerHub: Uses
DOCKER_USERNAMEandDOCKER_TOKENsecrets for authentication
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check workflow permissions and organization access
# Check if the repository has proper write permissions for packages
gh api repos/khulnasoft/pcm/actions/permissions | jq '.permissions.packages'
# Check other workflow files to see if they're configured with similar permissions
echo "Checking other workflows for package permissions..."
rg -A 2 "permissions:" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 5083
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Docker workflow for authentication and registry configuration
echo "Checking docker.yml for authentication..."
cat .github/workflows/docker.yml
# Check for Docker login steps
echo -e "\nChecking for docker login commands across workflows..."
rg "docker login" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 2400
50-51: Verify DockerHub authentication secrets configuration
The secret names have been changed from DOCKERHUB_USERNAME/TOKEN to DOCKER_USERNAME/TOKEN. While the change is valid, ensure these new secrets are properly configured in the repository settings.
✅ Verification successful
Docker authentication secrets change is safe to proceed
The verification shows that:
- The Docker authentication secrets (
DOCKER_USERNAMEandDOCKER_TOKEN) are only used indocker.yml - No other workflow files use either the old (
DOCKERHUB_*) or new (DOCKER_*) secret names - The Docker login implementation follows security best practices using pinned action versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other workflows that might be using the old secret names
# and could be affected by this change
# Search for old secret names in other workflow files
echo "Checking for workflows using old secret names..."
rg -l "DOCKERHUB_USERNAME|DOCKERHUB_TOKEN" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any usage of Docker-related secrets across all workflow files
# and also look for Docker login/authentication patterns
echo "Checking for Docker-related secrets and authentication in workflows..."
rg -i "docker.*(_username|_token|_password|login|auth)" .github/workflows/ -A 2 -B 2
echo -e "\nListing all workflow files for manual review..."
fd . .github/workflows/ -e yml -e yaml
Length of output: 2191
User description
Notes for Reviewers
This PR fixes #
Signed commits
PR Type
configuration changes
Description
pcmservice fromghcr.io/intel/pcm:latesttoghcr.io/khulnasoft/pcm:latest.Changes walkthrough 📝
docker-compose.yml
Update Docker image source for pcm servicedocker-compose.yml
pcmservice.ghcr.io/intel/pcm:latesttoghcr.io/khulnasoft/pcm:latest.Summary by Sourcery
Build:
Summary by CodeRabbit
pcmservice in the Docker configuration.