fix conflict #43
Open
fix conflict #43
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request primarily focuses on renaming the 'action' parameter to 'action_type' throughout the 'github_app.py' file. This change is implemented consistently across multiple functions and affects how GitHub events are handled and logged. The PR also includes minor adjustments to error logging and function calls to accommodate this parameter name change. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @gitworkflows - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider maintaining consistency in the renaming of 'action' to 'action_type'. There are still some instances where 'action' is used, such as in the
_perform_auto_commands_githubcall. - While this change addresses the immediate naming conflict, consider if there's a more fundamental way to improve the code structure. The high number of parameters in some functions might indicate an opportunity for refactoring.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
| @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ async def handle_comments_on_pr(body: Dict[str, Any], | |||
| event: str, | |||
| sender: str, | |||
| sender_id: str, | |||
| action: str, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Consider a more comprehensive solution for the 'action' vs 'action_type' naming conflict
The renaming of 'action' to 'action_type' addresses the immediate naming conflict but introduces inconsistency and potential confusion. Consider the following improvements:
- Evaluate if the 'action: PRAction' parameter is necessary in all functions. Remove it where it's not needed to eliminate the naming conflict.
- Ensure consistency across the file. Some functions (e.g., 'handle_closed_pr', 'get_log_context') use 'action_type', while others (e.g., '_perform_auto_commands_github') still use 'action'.
- Update the docstring for 'handle_request' function to reflect the change from 'action' to 'action_type'.
- Review the usage of 'action = PRAction()' in the 'handle_request' function, as it seems inconsistent with the renaming.
- Consider making the error log message in 'handle_request' more informative while updating it to use 'action_type'.
A more thorough refactoring could improve code clarity and maintainability.
action_type: str,
pr_action: PRAction,
| @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ | |||
| log_context["api_url"] = api_url | |||
| if pull_request.get("draft", True) or pull_request.get("state") != "open": | |||
| return invalid_result | |||
| if action in ("review_requested", "synchronize") and pull_request.get("created_at") == pull_request.get("updated_at"): | |||
| if action_type in ("review_requested", "synchronize") and pull_request.get("created_at") == pull_request.get("updated_at"): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Use set when checking membership of a collection of literals (collection-into-set)
Suggested change
| if action_type in ("review_requested", "synchronize") and pull_request.get("created_at") == pull_request.get("updated_at"): | |
| if action_type in {"review_requested", "synchronize"} and pull_request.get( | |
| "created_at" | |
| ) == pull_request.get("updated_at"): |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR fixes #
Notes for Reviewers
Signed commits
Summary by Sourcery
Fix variable name conflict by renaming 'action' to 'action_type' in functions handling GitHub PR events to avoid ambiguity and potential errors.
Bug Fixes: