Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tr/focus only on problems #79

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Tr/focus only on problems #79

merged 6 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

NxPKG
Copy link
Contributor

@NxPKG NxPKG commented Nov 7, 2024

User description

Notes for Reviewers

This PR fixes #

Signed commits

  • [*] Yes, I signed my commits.

PR Type

enhancement, documentation


Description

  • Introduced a new setting focus_only_on_problems to control whether code suggestions should focus primarily on identifying and fixing critical issues.
  • Updated the pr_code_suggestions.py to incorporate the new setting and adjust the logic for handling code suggestions.
  • Documented the new setting in improve.md to inform users about its purpose and usage.
  • Increased the max_context_tokens in configuration.toml to allow for more extensive context in suggestions.
  • Modified the prompts in pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml to align with the new focus setting, ensuring suggestions are tailored to critical problems when enabled.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
pr_code_suggestions.py
Add focus-only-on-problems setting and adjust suggestion logic

pr_insight/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py

  • Added focus_only_on_problems setting to control suggestion focus.
  • Modified logging behavior for no code suggestions.
  • Adjusted suggestion processing to handle critical issues.
  • +8/-2     
    pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml
    Update prompts for focus_only_on_problems setting               

    pr_insight/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml

  • Adjusted prompts based on focus_only_on_problems setting.
  • Modified suggestion guidelines for critical issues.
  • +17/-2   
    Documentation
    improve.md
    Document focus_only_on_problems setting in improve.md       

    docs/docs/tools/improve.md

  • Documented the focus_only_on_problems setting.
  • Explained its impact on code suggestion focus.
  • +4/-0     
    Configuration changes
    configuration.toml
    Update configuration for focus_only_on_problems and context tokens

    pr_insight/settings/configuration.toml

  • Increased max_context_tokens to 16000.
  • Added focus_only_on_problems configuration option.
  • +2/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    NxPKG added 4 commits November 7, 2024 15:10
    Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
    Copy link
    Contributor

    sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This PR introduces a new feature to focus code suggestions primarily on critical problems and bugs rather than style and best practices. The implementation adds a new configuration option focus_only_on_problems and modifies the code suggestion prompts and handling logic accordingly.

    ER diagram for configuration changes

    erDiagram
        CONFIGURATION {
            bool focus_only_on_problems
            int max_context_tokens
            bool commitable_code_suggestions
            int dual_publishing_score_threshold
        }
        CONFIGURATION ||--o{ PR_CODE_SUGGESTIONS : contains
        CONFIGURATION {
            bool focus_only_on_problems
        }
        note for CONFIGURATION "New configuration option added to focus on problems"
    
    Loading

    Class diagram for updated PR code suggestions

    classDiagram
        class CodeSuggestion {
            - existing_code: str
            - improved_code: str
            - one_sentence_summary: str
            - label: str
        }
        class PRCodeSuggestions {
        }
        class PRCodeSuggestionsPrompt {
            - system: str
        }
        class PRCodeSuggestionsHandler {
            - focus_only_on_problems: bool
        }
        CodeSuggestion --> PRCodeSuggestions
        PRCodeSuggestionsPrompt --> PRCodeSuggestionsHandler
        PRCodeSuggestionsHandler : +focus_only_on_problems
        note for PRCodeSuggestionsHandler "New attribute added to handle focus on problems"
    
    Loading

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Added new configuration option to focus on critical problems
    • Added new focus_only_on_problems boolean setting with default value of false
    • Updated configuration documentation to explain the new setting
    • Increased max_context_tokens from 14000 to 16000
    pr_insight/settings/configuration.toml
    docs/docs/tools/improve.md
    Modified code suggestion prompt template to support problem-focused mode
    • Added conditional logic to adjust task description based on focus_only_on_problems setting
    • Updated suggestion count guidance to allow fewer suggestions when in problem-focused mode
    • Modified label field description to limit label types in problem-focused mode
    pr_insight/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml
    Updated code suggestion handling logic
    • Added focus_only_on_problems to template variables
    • Modified label handling for critical issues
    • Updated logging and output behavior for cases with no suggestions
    • Added check for publish_output_no_suggestions setting
    pr_insight/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

    Warning

    Rate limit exceeded

    @NxPKG has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review.

    ⌛ How to resolve this issue?

    After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

    We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

    🚦 How do rate limits work?

    CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

    Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

    Please see our FAQ for further information.

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7cdbf39 and 44c7c2d.


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Possible Bug
    The new focus_only_on_problems setting might not be properly integrated with existing code, potentially leading to unexpected behavior or inconsistencies in code suggestion generation.

    Code Smell
    The hardcoded string 'critical' is used to determine if a suggestion is critical. This approach might be inflexible and prone to errors if the labeling system changes.

    Inconsistent Logic
    The new conditional statements for focus_only_on_problems might lead to inconsistent behavior in suggestion generation, potentially affecting the quality and relevance of the suggestions.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Use constants for string literals to improve code maintainability

    Consider using a constant for the 'critical' label to improve maintainability and
    reduce the risk of typos.

    pr_insight/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [456-458]

     CRITICAL_LABEL = 'critical'
    +POSSIBLE_ISSUE_LABEL = 'possible issue'
     if CRITICAL_LABEL in suggestion['label'].lower(): # we want the published labels to be less declarative
    -    suggestion['label'] = 'possible issue'
    +    suggestion['label'] = POSSIBLE_ISSUE_LABEL
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion improves code maintainability by using constants for string literals. However, the impact is moderate as it's a minor enhancement to already functioning code.

    5
    Enhancement
    Use more descriptive variable names to enhance code clarity

    Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of 'num_code_suggestions' to
    clearly indicate its purpose in the context of the focus_only_on_problems setting.

    pr_insight/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml [51]

    -- Provide up to {{ num_code_suggestions }} distinct and insightful code suggestions. Return less suggestions if no pertinent ones are applicable.
    +- Provide up to {{ max_critical_suggestions }} distinct and insightful code suggestions addressing critical issues. Return fewer suggestions if no pertinent ones are applicable.
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

    Why: While the suggestion aims to improve code clarity, it's not addressing a critical issue. The existing variable name is already reasonably clear, and the change would have minimal impact on code functionality or understanding.

    3

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hey @NxPKG - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

    Overall Comments:

    • Could you explain why the max_context_tokens was increased from 14000 to 16000? Is this increase necessary for the new feature?
    Here's what I looked at during the review
    • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
    • 🟢 Security: all looks good
    • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
    • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
    • 🟡 Documentation: 1 issue found

    Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
    Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

    @@ -275,6 +275,10 @@ Using a combination of both can help the AI model to provide relevant and tailor
    <td><b>dual_publishing_score_threshold</b></td>
    <td>Minimum score threshold for suggestions to be presented as commitable PR comments in addition to the table. Default is -1 (disabled).</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
    <td><b>focus_only_on_problems</b></td>
    <td>If set to true, suggestions will focus primarily on identifying and fixing code problems, and less on style considerations like best practices, maintainability, or readability. Default is false.</td>
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    nitpick (documentation): Consider adjusting punctuation to match other entries in the table

    Other entries in the table end with a single period. Consider restructuring this entry to maintain consistent punctuation.

    Signed-off-by: NxPKG <iconmamundentist@gmail.com>
    @NxPKG NxPKG merged commit 7d97b59 into main Nov 7, 2024
    7 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant