Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix code scanning alert no. 18: Use of password hash with insufficient computational effort #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

gitworkflows
Copy link
Contributor

@gitworkflows gitworkflows commented Oct 23, 2024

User description

Fixes https://github.com/khulnasoft/shipyard/security/code-scanning/18

To fix the problem, we need to replace the use of sha256 with a more secure password hashing algorithm, such as bcrypt. This will ensure that the hashed passwords are computationally intensive to crack, providing better security.

  1. Import the bcrypt library.
  2. Replace the makeSubHash function to use bcrypt for hashing the password.
  3. Ensure that the bcrypt hash is truncated to the same length (14 characters) to maintain existing functionality.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Replace the use of sha256 with bcrypt for password hashing to address insufficient computational effort in password security.

PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement


Description

  • Replaced the use of sha256 with bcrypt for password hashing to enhance security.
  • Updated the makeSubHash function to use bcrypt.hashSync and ensured the hash is truncated to 14 characters.
  • Added bcrypt as a new dependency in package.json.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
CloudBackup.js
Enhance password hashing with bcrypt for better security 

src/utils/CloudBackup.js

  • Replaced sha256 with bcrypt for password hashing.
  • Updated makeSubHash to use bcrypt.hashSync.
  • Ensured hash is truncated to 14 characters.
  • +2/-2     
    Dependencies
    package.json
    Add bcrypt dependency for secure password hashing               

    package.json

    • Added bcrypt as a new dependency.
    +2/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    …t computational effort
    
    Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
    Signed-off-by: gitworkflows <118260833+gitworkflows@users.noreply.github.com>
    Copy link

    sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This pull request addresses a code scanning alert by replacing the use of SHA-256 with bcrypt for password hashing. The change improves the security of the password hashing process by using a more computationally intensive algorithm.

    No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Replace SHA-256 with bcrypt for password hashing
    • Import the bcrypt library (implied)
    • Modify the makeSubHash function to use bcrypt.hashSync instead of sha256
    • Maintain the 14-character length of the hashed password by slicing the bcrypt output
    src/utils/CloudBackup.js

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    @gitworkflows gitworkflows marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 05:50
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Potential Compatibility Issue
    The change from sha256 to bcrypt might affect existing user passwords. Ensure there's a migration plan for existing hashed passwords.

    Performance Concern
    Bcrypt is intentionally slow for security, which might impact performance in high-volume scenarios. Consider the trade-off between security and performance.

    Copy link

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hey @gitworkflows - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

    Overall Comments:

    • Truncating the bcrypt hash to 14 characters may significantly reduce its security benefits. Consider redesigning the system to accommodate the full bcrypt hash.
    • Please provide information on the migration strategy for existing hashed passwords and the potential performance impact of using bcrypt. Have you profiled the system with this change?
    Here's what I looked at during the review
    • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
    • 🟢 Security: all looks good
    • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
    • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
    • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

    Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
    Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Avoid truncating cryptographic hashes to maintain their security properties

    The makeSubHash function truncates the bcrypt hash to 14 characters, which
    significantly reduces its security. Consider using the full bcrypt hash or a more
    appropriate method for generating a fixed-length identifier.

    src/utils/CloudBackup.js [20]

    -const makeSubHash = (pass) => bcrypt.hashSync(pass, 10).slice(0, 14);
    +const makeSubHash = (pass) => bcrypt.hashSync(pass, 10);
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Truncating a bcrypt hash significantly reduces its security, making this suggestion highly relevant. By recommending the use of the full hash, it addresses a critical security concern, ensuring the integrity and strength of the cryptographic operation.

    9
    Performance
    Use asynchronous bcrypt hashing for improved performance and non-blocking operation

    Consider using an async version of bcrypt for better performance in a server
    environment. Replace bcrypt.hashSync with bcrypt.hash and make the function
    asynchronous.

    src/utils/CloudBackup.js [20]

    -const makeSubHash = (pass) => bcrypt.hashSync(pass, 10).slice(0, 14);
    +const makeSubHash = async (pass) => {
    +  const hash = await bcrypt.hash(pass, 10);
    +  return hash.slice(0, 14);
    +};
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion improves performance by making the hashing operation non-blocking, which is beneficial in server environments. It accurately modifies the code to use the asynchronous version of bcrypt, enhancing the application's responsiveness.

    8
    Enhancement
    Implement error handling for decryption operations to improve robustness

    The decryptData function doesn't handle potential errors that may occur during
    decryption. Consider adding a try-catch block to handle decryption failures
    gracefully.

    src/utils/CloudBackup.js [17]

    -const decryptData = (data, password) => aes.decrypt(data, password).toString(Utf8);
    +const decryptData = (data, password) => {
    +  try {
    +    return aes.decrypt(data, password).toString(Utf8);
    +  } catch (error) {
    +    console.error('Decryption failed:', error);
    +    throw new Error('Failed to decrypt data');
    +  }
    +};
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding error handling to the decryption function enhances the robustness of the application by managing potential decryption failures gracefully. This improvement increases the reliability of the code, although it does not address a critical issue.

    7

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    @gitworkflows gitworkflows merged commit 191980c into master Oct 23, 2024
    11 of 12 checks passed
    @gitworkflows gitworkflows deleted the alert-autofix-18 branch October 23, 2024 05:58
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    Status: Done
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant