Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 File event tests should be deterministic #797

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2021

Conversation

znatty22
Copy link
Member

@znatty22 znatty22 commented Nov 2, 2021

Some file event tests randomly fail bc they depend on a user that is not deterministic

@znatty22 znatty22 added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 2, 2021
@znatty22 znatty22 requested a review from gsantia November 2, 2021 20:19
@znatty22 znatty22 self-assigned this Nov 2, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 2, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #797 (f92db64) into master (9045543) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #797   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.70%   95.70%           
=======================================
  Files         172      172           
  Lines        7474     7474           
=======================================
  Hits         7153     7153           
  Misses        321      321           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9045543...f92db64. Read the comment docs.

@znatty22 znatty22 merged commit e809638 into master Nov 2, 2021
@znatty22 znatty22 deleted the fix-file-event-tests branch November 2, 2021 20:35
gsantia added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2021
## Release 1.20.0

### Summary

- Emojis: 🐛 x3, ♻️ x3, 📌 x1, ✨ x2
- Categories: Additions x2, Fixes x3, Ops x1, Other Changes x3

### New features and changes

- [#797](#797) - 🐛 File event tests should be deterministic - [e809638](e809638) by [znatty22](https://github.com/znatty22)
- [#791](#791) - 🐛 Use proper bucket arn in bucket inventory configuration - [9045543](9045543) by [znatty22](https://github.com/znatty22)
- [#794](#794) - ♻️ Only save study attrs from Dataservice that exist on Study - [3c09f5e](3c09f5e) by [znatty22](https://github.com/znatty22)
- [#793](#793) - 📌 Pin docutils<0.18 - [75a989a](75a989a) by [znatty22](https://github.com/znatty22)
- [#787](#787) - ♻️ Refactor naming of single template package names - [96c6c41](96c6c41) by [gsantia](https://github.com/gsantia)
- [#785](#785) - ♻️ Refactor update study and file log message to which fields are updated - [93a79b1](93a79b1) by [XuTheBunny](https://github.com/XuTheBunny)
- [#778](#778) - ✨ Add template download events - [b6498ab](b6498ab) by [gsantia](https://github.com/gsantia)
- [#776](#776) - ✨ Capture time of release termination - [22322e8](22322e8) by [gsantia](https://github.com/gsantia)
- [#783](#783) - 🐛 Fix release logging messages - [931e9d9](931e9d9) by [gsantia](https://github.com/gsantia)
@gsantia gsantia mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants