Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: getUserOrganizations returning null incorrectly. #158

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

DanielRivers
Copy link
Contributor

Explain your changes

Fix which caused getUserOrganizations to return null

Checklist

🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The update in getUserOrganizations.js enhances the robustness of the getUserOrganizationsFactory function by ensuring it gracefully handles null or undefined values when mapping organization names. This change improves the function's reliability in scenarios where the data might be incomplete or missing.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/session/getUserOrganizations.js Updated the getUserOrganizationsFactory to use optional chaining (?.) in orgNames.map, enhancing null safety.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c3f7e5 and e6c0a5b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/session/getUserOrganizations.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/session/getUserOrganizations.js (1)

27-27: Use of optional chaining (?.) improves robustness by preventing errors when orgNames is null or undefined.

src/session/getUserOrganizations.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6c0a5b and 87c17e1.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/session/getUserOrganizations.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/session/getUserOrganizations.js

@DanielRivers DanielRivers merged commit 9a7bf32 into main May 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@DanielRivers DanielRivers deleted the fix/getUserOrganizations branch May 9, 2024 11:50
peterphanouvong pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2024
fix: getUserOrganizations returning null incorrectly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant