Feature Request: Dockerfile or image in dockerhub

[fruch]

there's an offical VM,
I was looking for offical dockerhub image, cause it's much easier to operate (and automated, i.e. travis-ci and such)

Are some technical diffeculties that I'm missing or just no on had time to invest in it ? what's actully needed to make it "offical" ?
I see some people have something working (I guess, didn't tried it yet)
https://github.com/tshirtman/Buildozer-docker/blob/master/Dockerfile

[jedie]

I have made a docker image here: https://hub.docker.com/r/jedie/buildozer/ sources here: https://github.com/jedie/kivy-buildozer-docker and a project that use it here: https://github.com/jedie/RunCalculator

The idea was to create docker image and the .apk on Travis-CI ;)

[fruch]

would be nice to have this in the offical docs

[inclement]

The reason this is not officially supported or documented is entirely that nobody has had time to do it. I hope to get time to look into it at some point.

[fruch]

👍

python + kivy + docker + android, all the things I love together. that would be great.

[James-E-A]

Would absolutely love something like this officially distributed.

There seem to be a few unofficial images floating around GitHub in various states of disrepair [1][2], but it looks like it's not going to be so simple to run a build server.

I really really like what you've done with this, to be able to have an entire Android development toolchain without "dirtying one's hands" (or cluttering one's system) with the nitty-gritty details normally accompanying preparing a build cycle (or, worse yet, being vendor-locked) is great, and being able to run it in Docker would add just that much more ease of deployment.

[robertpro]

Actually I think this will improve the people get involved into Kivy, since every time I talk about kivy, some one tells me that it is hard to install and just give up, and said this is only for Python enthusiastic people, but I don't think this is true, because I found a lot of potential on Kivy.

So dockerizing Kivy, would increase the community.

[AndreMiras]

I can work on it if you guys are still interested :)

[fruch]

@AndreMiras would love to take if for a spin

[robertpro]

@AndreMiras very interested

[AndreMiras]

So I see two approaches depending on the goals we want to achieve.

1. we want it for continuous integration, making sure after each push things work as expected
2. we want to provide a Dockerfile for people to use it for their projects

For 1. basically the build buildozer from source code after each push and run tests on it, but it's not convenient for people to use. And for 2. we provide a Dockerfile that installs/provides the latest buildozer release

I can work on both, but what do you guys want first?

[fruch]

I think #2 is a bit more important, since it's affects more people.

…

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018, 22:25 Andre Miras ***@***.***> wrote: So I see two approaches depending on the goals we want to achieve. 1. we want it for continuous integration, making sure after each push things work as expected 2. we want to provide a Dockerfile for people to use it for their projects For 1. basically the build buildozer from source code after each push and run tests on it, but it's not convenient for people to use. And for 2. we provide a Dockerfile that installs/provides the latest buildozer release I can work on both, but what do you guys want first? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#589 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUz84X0KofkxwlpqkxpCTidL44mRG74ks5t9_7FgaJpZM4Quc6h> .

[AndreMiras]

Thanks guys, I'll look into it soon then 😄

[AndreMiras]

Work in progress here:
#681

So basically it makes it provides the buildozer command, but doesn't currently share the file system with the host. It means that you cannot yet use it to build projects on your host, unless you ADD them manually.
Mounting the host current working directory to the docker guest might just be enough. But I need to take a look because it could be cumbersome.
I'll keep you posted.

[AndreMiras]

I've updated the Dockerfile with comments how to mount it with host CWD.
So basically after building the image (pretty quick), I was (almost) able to build an apk doing a:

docker run --volume "$(pwd)":/home/user/hostcwd buildozer android debug

I'll investigate why the apk didn't build completely and give an update rather than this is for sure fixed or not.

[AndreMiras]

Pull request with working Dockerfile is ready in #681