Feat(frontend): add footer and revert graffle to graph-ql #11
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to multiple files in the frontend project. The Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
frontend/src/components/TrustedBy.tsx (2)
26-31: Add loading and quality attributes to Image component.The Next.js Image component could benefit from additional optimization attributes.
<Image src={icon_svg.url} alt={name} width="42" height="42" + loading="lazy" + quality={85} />
14-17: Consider using semantic HTML elements.The current implementation uses div and p tags, but semantic elements would improve accessibility.
-<div className="bg-background-2 py-4 px-6"> - <p className="text-2xl mx-auto w-max mb-2 text-secondary-text"> +<section className="bg-background-2 py-4 px-6"> + <h2 className="text-2xl mx-auto w-max mb-2 text-secondary-text"> Trusted By - </p> + </h2>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Button.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/TrustedBy.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/pages/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/queries/footer.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/queries/partners.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/graphQLClient.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
frontend/src/utils/graphQLClient.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Clean import of GraphQLClient.The import statement is correctly structured and the empty line maintains good readability.
Also applies to: 2-2
1-14: Verify the impact of switching from Graffle to GraphQLClient.The change from Graffle to graphql-request's GraphQLClient is significant. Let's verify all GraphQL operations are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL client migration appears compatible with existing operations
The switch from Graffle to GraphQLClient is safe as:
- All GraphQL operations use the standard
gqltag fromgraphql-request- Queries are defined in a compatible format in
partners.tsxandfooter.tsx- No active Graffle client usage found (only build-time references in package.json)
- The GraphQL operations are simple queries that will work with the new GraphQLClient
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining Graffle imports or usage echo "Checking for remaining Graffle references..." rg -i "graffle" --type ts --type tsx # Search for GraphQL operations to verify they're compatible with graphql-request echo "Checking GraphQL operation patterns..." rg "gql`|gql\(" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 344
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining Graffle references with correct file type flags echo "Checking for remaining Graffle references..." rg -i "graffle" -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact # Search for GraphQL operations and their patterns echo "Checking GraphQL operation patterns..." rg "gql|query\s+{|mutation\s+{" -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact # Look for GraphQL client usage patterns echo "Checking GraphQL client usage patterns..." rg "\.query\(|\.mutate\(|\.request\(" -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreactLength of output: 716
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining Graffle references echo "Checking for remaining Graffle references..." rg -i "graffle" # Search for GraphQL operations and their patterns echo "Checking GraphQL operation patterns..." rg "gql" # Look for GraphQL client usage patterns echo "Checking GraphQL client usage patterns..." rg -l "(query|mutate|request)\(" # Check for GraphQL operation definitions echo "Checking GraphQL operation definitions..." ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = gql`$$$`'Length of output: 2740
frontend/src/queries/partners.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM!The import statement correctly imports the necessary
gqltag function from graphql-request.
3-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd operation name and consider pagination for the GraphQL query.
The query should follow GraphQL best practices:
- Include an operation name for better debugging and APM tracking
- Consider adding pagination for scalability
- Handle potential null fields with proper typing
Consider this improved version:
-export const partnersQuery = gql` - { +export const partnersQuery = gql` + query GetPartners { partners { - name + name icon_svg { - url + url } } } `;Let's check if pagination might be needed based on the current partners data:
frontend/src/components/Button.tsx (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and necessary imports.The imports are appropriate for the component's needs.
20-20: LGTM! Proper default export.The default export is appropriate for this component.
1-20: Verify consistent Button component usage across the codebase.Let's ensure the component is being used consistently across the application.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to find Button component usage.
Let me try one more time with corrected commands:
Button component implementation and usage are consistent
The Button component is currently used in Footer.tsx with the expected props and styling. No raw button elements are found in the codebase except for the one in the Button component itself. The implementation follows a consistent pattern:
- Footer.tsx properly imports and uses the Button component
- No other direct button elements that need to be replaced
- The styling through className prop is properly utilized
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check Button component usage patterns across the codebase # Search for Button component imports and usage echo "Checking Button component imports and usage patterns..." rg -l "import.*Button.*from.*components/Button" --type tsx # Check for direct button elements that might need to be replaced with the Button component echo "Checking for potential button elements that could use the Button component..." ast-grep --pattern '<button $$$>$$$</button>'Length of output: 786
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Button component imports with ripgrep, trying different file extensions echo "Checking Button component imports..." rg -l "import.*Button.*from.*components/Button" --type ts --type jsx --type js # Search for potential Button component usage patterns echo "Checking Button component usage patterns..." rg -A 2 "<Button" --type ts --type jsx --type js # List all TypeScript/JavaScript files to ensure we're searching the right files echo "Listing all potential frontend files..." fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js frontend/Length of output: 839
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all frontend files first echo "Listing frontend files..." fd . frontend/ # Search for Button component imports echo "Checking Button component imports..." rg "import.*Button.*from.*components/Button" # Search for Button component usage echo "Checking Button component usage..." rg -A 2 "<Button" # Search for raw button elements echo "Checking raw button elements..." rg -A 2 "<button"Length of output: 1733
frontend/package.json (2)
15-17: Review dependency changes impact.The changes look reasonable with a few considerations:
- Removing
@opentelemetry/apimight affect application monitoring- Adding
graphql-requestas a replacement forgrafflealigns with the PR objective- Adding
clsxis appropriate for component styling needs#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify dependency usage and potential breaking changes # Test 1: Check for remaining OpenTelemetry usage echo "Checking for OpenTelemetry usage..." rg "@opentelemetry" -g "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" # Test 2: Verify graffle client replacement echo "Checking for remaining graffle usage..." rg "from ['|\"]graffle" -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
5-5: Verify ESM compatibility across the codebase.Adding
"type": "module"is a significant change that affects how Node.js interprets JavaScript files. This could impact build processes and dependencies.✅ Verification successful
ESM configuration is compatible with the codebase
The codebase is already using ESM syntax throughout:
- All frontend files use ESM imports/exports exclusively
- Configuration files are using
.mjsextension (next.config.mjs, postcss.config.mjs)- No CommonJS
require()ormodule.exportspatterns were foundThe addition of
"type": "module"in package.json aligns with the existing ESM usage and is a recommended practice for modern Node.js projects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential ESM compatibility issues # Test 1: Look for CommonJS require statements that need to be converted to ESM echo "Checking for CommonJS require statements..." rg "require\(['\"]" -g "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" # Test 2: Look for module.exports that need to be converted to ESM echo "Checking for CommonJS exports..." rg "module\.exports" -g "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}"Length of output: 351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to check ESM compatibility # Check for CommonJS patterns echo "=== Checking for CommonJS patterns ===" rg -g "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" "(?:const|let|var).*=.*require\(['\"]|module\.exports" # Check for import/export patterns to verify ESM usage echo -e "\n=== Checking for ESM patterns ===" rg -g "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" "^(import|export) " # Check for configuration files that might need ESM compatibility echo -e "\n=== Checking for config files ===" fd -e config.js -e config.mjs -e config.cjs # Check package.json files for type field echo -e "\n=== Checking other package.json files ===" fd package.json --exec grep -l "\"type\":"Length of output: 17020
frontend/src/pages/index.tsx (1)
3-5: LGTM: Import statements are properly structured.The imports correctly reflect the transition to GraphQL-based data fetching, with proper type imports.
frontend/src/queries/footer.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM!Clean and appropriate import of the GraphQL request library.
1-57: Verify GraphQL schema compatibility.Before implementing the suggested changes, please verify that the GraphQL schema supports these modifications.
frontend/src/components/TrustedBy.tsx (1)
7-9: LGTM! Well-defined TypeScript interface.The interface is properly typed with partnersQueryType, ensuring type safety for the component's props.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/queries/footer.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/queries/footer.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (7)
3-13: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions.The imports are well-organized, and the type definitions are properly structured. The hover scale utility is a good abstraction for reusable hover effects.
24-24: Fix invalid Tailwind gradient class.The class
to-[27.74%]is not a valid Tailwind CSS class. Consider using standard Tailwind gradient stops or defining a custom gradient in your Tailwind config.
31-33: Use proper heading hierarchy.Multiple
h1tags can harm accessibility and SEO. Useh2for section headings within the footer.
58-58: Use numeric values for Image dimensions.The Next.js Image component expects numeric values for width and height props.
69-75: Use numeric values for logo Image dimensions.Similarly, ensure the logo Image component uses numeric width and height values.
78-80: Avoid block elements inside Button.Using a
<p>tag inside a<Button>component is not semantically correct. Use a<span>or pass text directly.
Line range hint
16-84: Verify footer data structure.The component relies heavily on the footerData structure. Let's verify the GraphQL query matches the expected shape.
✅ Verification successful
Footer data structure is properly defined and matches component usage
The GraphQL query structure in
queries/footer.tsxperfectly aligns with the component's usage:
- The query defines all required sections:
footerLinksSection,footerSocialsSection, andfooterSubscribeCta- The TypeScript type
footerQueryTypematches the query shape and is properly used in theIFooterinterface- All fields accessed in the Footer component (
socials,sections,cta) correspond to the defined structure🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the footer GraphQL query definition rg -l 'query.*footer' --type tsLength of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different approaches to find footer-related queries and types # Search for footer-related GraphQL queries with different patterns rg -i 'query.*footer|fragment.*footer' --type graphql --type ts # Search for footer interface or type definitions rg -i 'interface.*footer|type.*footer' --type ts # Search for files containing "footer" in their name fd -i footerLength of output: 1996
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the footer query and type definitions # Check the footer query implementation cat frontend/src/queries/footer.tsx # Check the footer interface definition cat frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx | rg -A 5 "interface IFooter"Length of output: 1176
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1)
64-67: Simplify clsx usage.The current clsx implementation with nested arrays is unnecessarily complex.
-className={clsx( - ["flex flex-col justify-center items-center"], - ["bg-background-2 py-16"], -)} +className={clsx( + "flex flex-col justify-center items-center", + "bg-background-2 py-16" +)}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/TrustedBy.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/pages/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/queries/footer.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/queries/partners.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- frontend/src/components/TrustedBy.tsx
- frontend/src/pages/index.tsx
- frontend/src/queries/footer.tsx
- frontend/src/queries/partners.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (4)
3-13: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.The imports are appropriate, and the type definition correctly matches the component's requirements. Good practice using a reusable animation constant.
16-19: LGTM! Clean data organization.Good practice splitting the footer data into logical sections with descriptive variable names.
16-82: Overall implementation looks good!The Footer component is well-structured with clear separation of concerns between different sections (links, socials, and CTA). While there are some minor improvements suggested above and in previous comments, the overall implementation is solid and follows React best practices.
34-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove URL validation for external links.
The current check for external links using
startsWith("http")could be more robust.-target={url.trim().startsWith("http") ? "_blank" : ""} +target={/^https?:\/\//.test(url.trim()) ? "_blank" : undefined}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1)
Line range hint
16-84: Well-structured component with good separation of concerns.The component demonstrates good architectural decisions:
- Clear separation of data and presentation
- Proper TypeScript usage
- Consistent styling approach with Tailwind
- Reusable animation patterns
Consider extracting the footer sections into separate components if this component grows further to maintain maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/src/components/Button.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/Button.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (5)
3-13: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.The imports are appropriate, and the type definition using FooterQueryType provides good type safety.
16-19: LGTM! Clean data organization.Good separation of concerns with clear destructuring of the footer data into logical sections.
23-26: Fix invalid Tailwind gradient class.The class
to-[27.74%]is still invalid. This was previously flagged in an earlier review.
58-58: Fix Image component props type.The width and height props are still strings instead of numbers. This was previously flagged.
69-75: Fix Image component props type in CTA section.The width and height props are still strings instead of numbers. This was previously flagged.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Buttoncomponent for enhanced UI interaction.TrustedBycomponent to showcase partner logos.Footercomponent to include links and a call-to-action section.Improvements
Homecomponent for better performance and structure.Dependencies
graphql-requestfor GraphQL operations.clsxandgraphql-request.