refactor(cms): pnk-token-page-types #28
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the content management system's schema, focusing on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-website-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cms-backend/src/api/exchange/content-types/exchange/schema.json (1)
7-8: Enhance schema documentationConsider adding a more descriptive explanation in the
descriptionfield to help content editors understand:
- The purpose of an Exchange entry
- Required fields and their format
- How it relates to the PNK token page
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
cms-backend/types/generated/components.d.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**cms-backend/types/generated/contentTypes.d.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
cms-backend/src/api/exchange/content-types/exchange/schema.json(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-buy-section/content-types/pnk-token-page-buy-section/schema.json(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/components/pnk-token-page/buy-card.json(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- cms-backend/src/components/pnk-token-page/buy-card.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-buy-section/content-types/pnk-token-page-buy-section/schema.json (2)
22-26: Clarify the distinction between exchanges and featuredExchanges
Both relations target api::exchange.exchange. This could lead to:
- Confusion for content editors
- Potential data redundancy
- Maintenance overhead
Consider either:
- Combining them into a single relation with a "featured" boolean field in the Exchange type
- Documenting the distinct purpose of each relation in the schema description
Would you like me to propose a schema modification that combines these relations?
Line range hint 1-26: Verify data migration plan for removed buyCards
The schema shows removal of the buyCards component in favor of relations. Please ensure:
- Existing data is migrated to the new structure
- Frontend components are updated to handle the new data structure
Run this script to check for any remaining references to buyCards:
cms-backend/src/api/exchange/content-types/exchange/schema.json (2)
16-32: LGTM! Schema structure improvements
The changes improve the content structure by:
- Moving from a direct URL to a managed Link relation
- Adding a name field for better exchange identification
- Making the icon optional for flexibility
26-30: Verify the existence of Link content type
The new relation to api::link.link improves content management, but we need to ensure the target type exists and has the necessary fields.
Run this script to verify the Link content type:
✅ Verification successful
Link content type exists and has the required structure
The Link content type exists and contains the essential fields:
name(string, required, unique)url(string, required)
This validates that the relation from Exchange to Link is properly structured and will work as intended. The change from a direct URL field to a Link relation is a good architectural decision as it allows for better content management and reusability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the Link content type exists
fd --type f "schema.json" src/api/link
# If it exists, check its structure
if [ -f "src/api/link/content-types/link/schema.json" ]; then
cat src/api/link/content-types/link/schema.json
fi
Length of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the Link content type schema
fd --type f "schema.json"
# Also search for any references to link content type
rg -l "api::link.link"
Length of output: 2813
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the structure of the Link content type
cat cms-backend/src/api/link/content-types/link/schema.json
Length of output: 469
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-need-section/content-types/pnk-token-page-need-section/schema.json (1)
7-8: LGTM! Consider adding schema documentation.The empty description field has been added, which is good for future documentation. Consider adding a meaningful description to help other developers understand this content type's purpose.
- "description": "" + "description": "Schema for the 'Why you need PNK' section of the token page"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cms-backend/types/generated/contentTypes.d.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-need-section/content-types/pnk-token-page-need-section/schema.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-need-section/content-types/pnk-token-page-need-section/schema.json (1)
28-28: Verify impact of changing arrowLink's repeatable property.
Changing repeatable from true to false is a breaking change that could affect existing content. This means the section will now support only a single button link instead of multiple ones.
Let's verify the current content structure and potential impact:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/content-types/token-explorer/schema.json (1)
15-25: Restrict icon media types to images onlySince this is for token explorers, the icon field should only accept image files. Currently, it allows files, videos, and audios which aren't appropriate for icons.
"icon": { "type": "media", "multiple": false, - "required": false, + "required": true, "allowedTypes": [ - "images", - "files", - "videos", - "audios" + "images" ] }cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-hero/content-types/pnk-token-page-hero/schema.json (1)
27-35: Restrict background media types based on usageThe background field allows all media types including files and audios, which seems overly permissive for what's likely meant to be a visual background.
"background": { "type": "media", "multiple": false, "required": false, "allowedTypes": [ "images", - "files", - "videos", - "audios" ] }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cms-backend/types/generated/contentTypes.d.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
cms-backend/src/api/exchange/content-types/exchange/schema.json(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-hero/content-types/pnk-token-page-hero/schema.json(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/content-types/token-explorer/schema.json(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/controllers/token-explorer.ts(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/routes/token-explorer.ts(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/services/token-explorer.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/routes/token-explorer.ts
- cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/services/token-explorer.ts
- cms-backend/src/api/token-explorer/controllers/token-explorer.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cms-backend/src/api/exchange/content-types/exchange/schema.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cms-backend/src/api/pnk-token-page-hero/content-types/pnk-token-page-hero/schema.json (1)
Line range hint 1-37: Verify the impact of removing the socials attribute
The removal of the socials attribute might affect existing content or frontend components that depend on this data.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search approach to verify the impact of removing the socials attribute.
Let me check the specific content of relevant files to understand if the removed socials attribute from pnk-token-page-hero is referenced.
Let me try one final check to see if there are any GraphQL queries or components specifically related to the PNK token page hero.
The removal of the socials attribute appears to be safe
Based on the verification results:
- While there are several files in the codebase that use "socials" (mainly in navbar and footer components), none of them reference the
socialsattribute from thePNKTokenPageHerotype. - The only files that reference
PNKTokenPageHeroare the schema definition and the generated type definitions, with no evidence of thesocialsfield being used in any frontend components or queries.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to the removed socials field
echo "Checking for frontend references to socials..."
rg -l "socials" --type ts --type tsx
echo "Checking for template references..."
rg -l "socials" --type json --type graphql
Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for 'socials' references across all files
echo "Searching for 'socials' references..."
rg -l "socials"
# Check for any GraphQL queries specifically in the frontend
echo -e "\nChecking for GraphQL query files..."
fd -e graphql
# Look for potential frontend component files
echo -e "\nChecking for frontend component files..."
fd -e tsx -e ts -e jsx -e js
Length of output: 9376
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files that might reference PNK token page hero socials
echo "Checking frontend queries for PNK token page..."
fd -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx . frontend/src/queries | xargs rg -l "pnk.*hero"
echo -e "\nChecking content of potential query files..."
rg "pnk.*hero.*socials" frontend/src/queries
echo -e "\nChecking frontend components for PNK token page..."
fd -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx . frontend/src/components | xargs rg -l "pnk.*hero"
echo -e "\nChecking components content for socials usage..."
rg "socials.*pnk" frontend/src/components
Length of output: 693
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any PNK token page related files and their content
echo "Checking for PNK token page related files..."
rg -l "PNKTokenPageHero"
echo -e "\nChecking content of these files for socials usage..."
rg -A 5 "PNKTokenPageHero.*socials"
Length of output: 414
| "name": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, | ||
| "url": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation and constraints to name and url fields
The name and url fields lack validation constraints which could lead to data integrity issues:
- The
namefield should have length constraints and uniqueness validation - The
urlfield should have URL format validation
"name": {
- "type": "string"
+ "type": "string",
+ "required": true,
+ "unique": true,
+ "minLength": 1,
+ "maxLength": 50
},
"url": {
- "type": "string"
+ "type": "string",
+ "required": true,
+ "regex": "^https?:\\/\\/.+",
+ "unique": true
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "name": { | |
| "type": "string" | |
| }, | |
| "url": { | |
| "type": "string" | |
| } | |
| "name": { | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "required": true, | |
| "unique": true, | |
| "minLength": 1, | |
| "maxLength": 50 | |
| }, | |
| "url": { | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "required": true, | |
| "regex": "^https?:\\/\\/.+", | |
| "unique": true | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores