feat: use transition instead of animation for the tooltips

[alcercu]

PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on refining the StyledTooltip component in the src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx file by enhancing its styling and animations.

Detailed summary

• Removed the import of fadeIn from ../../styles/common-style.
• Added a transition property to StyledTooltip for smoother opacity and visibility changes.
• Updated the opacity from 0% to 100% on hover for better visibility.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced tooltip appearance with updated opacity and visibility transitions.
  • Simplified hover effect for tooltip visibility.

• Bug Fixes

  • Removed unused animation to streamline tooltip behavior.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Tooltip component in the src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx file, focusing on updating the styling and transition mechanism for tooltip visibility. The changes remove the fadeIn animation and replace it with a CSS-based opacity transition. The core functionality of the tooltip remains unchanged, with the positioning and rendering logic preserved.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx	- Removed fadeIn animation import - Updated StyledTooltip with new CSS transition for opacity and visibility - Modified Wrapper hover effect to change opacity to 100%

Poem

🐰 A tooltip's dance, no longer fades in sight,
Opacity slides with a smooth, gentle might.
Hover and watch the magic unfold,
A transition so subtle, yet perfectly bold!
CodeRabbit's touch, making UI just right. 🎨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0480f8f and fe4127f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx (3 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx (3)

90-93: Consider optimizing the transition implementation

A few suggestions to improve the tooltip transition:

1. The 0.5s duration might feel slow for a tooltip - consider reducing to 0.2s-0.3s for better responsiveness
2. Use decimal values for opacity (0 instead of 0%) to follow CSS conventions
3. Remove visibility from transition as it's a binary property and doesn't actually transition

- transition: opacity 0.5s, visibility 0.5s;
+ transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out;
  ${({ place, theme, small }) => css`
    visibility: hidden;
-   opacity: 0%;
+   opacity: 0;

---

146-146: Standardize opacity value

For consistency with CSS conventions, use decimal values for opacity.

-    opacity: 100%;
+    opacity: 1;

---

Line range hint 90-146: Overall implementation looks good

The transition from animation to CSS transitions is well-implemented and more performant. The tooltip functionality remains intact while simplifying the show/hide mechanism.

Using CSS transitions instead of animations is a good choice here as it:

1. Reduces complexity
2. Improves performance
3. Provides smoother state transitions

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd16d8f and 0480f8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx (3 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/lib/tooltip/index.tsx (1)

3-3: LGTM: Import cleanup aligns with transition-based approach

The removal of the animation import and retention of necessary styling imports is appropriate for the transition to CSS-based animations.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[tractorss]

lgtm