-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove unnecessary port fields in frontend_key #300
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I cannot understand how we do lb based only on the target ip now
update the workload proposal later. |
@@ -29,8 +29,7 @@ typedef struct bpf_sock_addr ctx_buff_t; | |||
|
|||
#define DECLARE_VAR_ADDRESS(ctx, name) \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we rename this macro, it is to construct frontend key
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hope to see the following fix on direct pod access soon
okay, asap |
Signed-off-by: kwb0523 <kwb0523@163.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hzxuzhonghu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #277
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: