Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove unnecessary port fields in frontend_key #300

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

kwb0523
Copy link
Contributor

@kwb0523 kwb0523 commented May 7, 2024

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #277

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


Copy link
Member

@hzxuzhonghu hzxuzhonghu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I cannot understand how we do lb based only on the target ip now

@kwb0523
Copy link
Contributor Author

kwb0523 commented May 9, 2024

I cannot understand how we do lb based only on the target ip now

I cannot understand how we do lb based only on the target ip now

update the workload proposal later.

@@ -29,8 +29,7 @@ typedef struct bpf_sock_addr ctx_buff_t;

#define DECLARE_VAR_ADDRESS(ctx, name) \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we rename this macro, it is to construct frontend key

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

hzxuzhonghu
hzxuzhonghu previously approved these changes May 9, 2024
Copy link
Member

@hzxuzhonghu hzxuzhonghu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hope to see the following fix on direct pod access soon

@kwb0523
Copy link
Contributor Author

kwb0523 commented May 9, 2024

Hope to see the following fix on direct pod access soon

okay, asap

Signed-off-by: kwb0523 <kwb0523@163.com>
Copy link
Member

@hzxuzhonghu hzxuzhonghu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kmesh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hzxuzhonghu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kmesh-bot kmesh-bot merged commit 0606ca4 into kmesh-net:main May 9, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

frontend data structure adjustment in the kmesh workload mode
3 participants