-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add single request timeout to the contract #1021
Add single request timeout to the contract #1021
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani <francescoguard@gmail.com>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: slinkydeveloper The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
...main/java/dev/knative/eventing/kafka/broker/dispatcher/http/HttpConsumerVerticleFactory.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...main/java/dev/knative/eventing/kafka/broker/dispatcher/http/HttpConsumerVerticleFactory.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Process is:
Right? |
That's exactly what I did for this PR |
LGTM |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1021 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 75.72% 75.69% -0.03%
Complexity 421 421
============================================
Files 74 74
Lines 2916 2921 +5
Branches 124 127 +3
============================================
+ Hits 2208 2211 +3
- Misses 556 557 +1
- Partials 152 153 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
// timeout is the single request timeout (not the overall retry timeout) | ||
uint64 timeout = 5; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The controller should set this field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know, not in this PR though :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to merge delivery-timeout first knative/eventing#5148
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok :)
/lgtm
/retest Tracing headers test flakyness |
…s#1021) Signed-off-by: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani francescoguard@gmail.com
This adds the support for the experimental feature
delivery-timeout
: knative/eventing#5148Also part of what was discussed in #757
Proposed Changes
EgressConfig.timeout
to configure the single request timeout