-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable KafkaSource auth support #1403
Enable KafkaSource auth support #1403
Conversation
553ebc2
to
4ee3c26
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1403 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 76.36% 76.37% +0.01%
+ Complexity 584 583 -1
============================================
Files 98 98
Lines 3626 3632 +6
Branches 165 166 +1
============================================
+ Hits 2769 2774 +5
- Misses 645 646 +1
Partials 212 212
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@@ -28,23 +28,20 @@ func (ks *SecretLocator) SecretName() (string, bool) { | |||
if !hasAuthConfig(ks.KafkaSource) { | |||
return "", false | |||
} | |||
return getName(ks.KafkaSource), hasAuthConfig(ks.KafkaSource) | |||
// KafkaSource uses a special secret provider, so there is no need to return a name here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
special, as in? mind linking to details?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me know if the new commit solves your comment
Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pdipilat@redhat.com>
4ee3c26
to
4b005c3
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: matzew, pierDipi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Part of #312
Proposed Changes
Release Note
Docs