Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add .spec.subscribers[].name field in KafkaChannel to align with eventing-core channel definition #3845

Conversation

creydr
Copy link
Contributor

@creydr creydr commented Apr 22, 2024

In knative/eventing#7733 we added the .spec.subscribers[].name field for Channels. This PR adjusts the KafkaChannel to support this field too.

This helps with tests issues from #3770

@creydr creydr requested review from pierDipi, Leo6Leo and Cali0707 April 22, 2024 07:18
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. area/control-plane labels Apr 22, 2024
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from matzew April 22, 2024 07:19
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.61%. Comparing base (551691c) to head (b8358ac).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #3845       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     73.90%   49.61%   -24.30%     
=============================================
  Files           100      246      +146     
  Lines          3407    14786    +11379     
  Branches        288        0      -288     
=============================================
+ Hits           2518     7336     +4818     
- Misses          716     6699     +5983     
- Partials        173      751      +578     
Flag Coverage Δ
java-unittests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@pierDipi pierDipi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Apr 22, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: creydr, pierDipi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@creydr
Copy link
Contributor Author

creydr commented Apr 22, 2024

/test reconciler-tests

@creydr
Copy link
Contributor Author

creydr commented Apr 22, 2024

/test integration-tests

@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 027e753 into knative-extensions:main Apr 22, 2024
28 of 33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/control-plane lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants