Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix kube auth provider test #828

Conversation

slinkydeveloper
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #629

Proposed Changes

@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper requested review from a team as code owners April 21, 2021 12:45
@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper requested review from a team April 21, 2021 12:45
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Apr 21, 2021
@slinkydeveloper
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @pierDipi

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 21, 2021
Signed-off-by: Francesco Guardiani <francescoguard@gmail.com>
@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper force-pushed the fix_kube_auth_provider_test branch from 97965c0 to b78111c Compare April 21, 2021 12:45
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #828 (b78111c) into main (62fe1c8) will increase coverage by 4.89%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #828      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.67%   76.57%   +4.89%     
- Complexity        0      440     +440     
============================================
  Files            28       77      +49     
  Lines          1257     2924    +1667     
  Branches          0      133     +133     
============================================
+ Hits            901     2239    +1338     
- Misses          277      534     +257     
- Partials         79      151      +72     
Flag Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
java-unittests 80.26% <ø> (?) 440.00 <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...fka/broker/core/eventbus/ContractMessageCodec.java 75.00% <0.00%> (ø) 5.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...ve/eventing/kafka/broker/core/metrics/Metrics.java 89.65% <0.00%> (ø) 6.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...ka/broker/dispatcher/ConsumerDeployerVerticle.java 69.09% <0.00%> (ø) 9.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...ting/kafka/broker/core/utils/ReferenceCounter.java 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) 5.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...fka/broker/core/security/CredentialsValidator.java 93.93% <0.00%> (ø) 22.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...ting/kafka/broker/dispatcher/RecordDispatcher.java 93.67% <0.00%> (ø) 24.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...a/broker/core/security/KubernetesAuthProvider.java 86.36% <0.00%> (ø) 5.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...ka/broker/core/security/KubernetesCredentials.java 84.61% <0.00%> (ø) 39.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...core/tracing/OpenTelemetryVertxTracingFactory.java 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) 2.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...ve/eventing/kafka/broker/receiver/ReceiverEnv.java 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) 6.00% <0.00%> (?%)
... and 39 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 62fe1c8...b78111c. Read the comment docs.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 21, 2021
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pierDipi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 21, 2021
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit bb2eeae into knative-extensions:main Apr 21, 2021
@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper deleted the fix_kube_auth_provider_test branch April 21, 2021 19:35
pierDipi pushed a commit to pierDipi/eventing-kafka-broker that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
Cali0707 added a commit to Cali0707/eventing-kafka-broker that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
* Make SecretSpec field of consumers Auth omitempty (knative-extensions#780)

* Expose init offset and schedule metrics for ConsumerGroup reconciler (knative-extensions#790) (knative-extensions#791)

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

* Fix channel finalizer logic (knative-extensions#3295) (knative-extensions#795)

Signed-off-by: Calum Murray <cmurray@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Calum Murray <cmurray@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

* [release-v1.10] SRVKE-958: Cache init offsets results (knative-extensions#817)

* Cache init offsets results

When there is high load and multiple consumer group schedule calls,
we get many `dial tcp 10.130.4.8:9092: i/o timeout` errors when
trying to connect to Kafka.
This leads to increased "time to readiness" for consumer groups.

The downside of caching is that, in the case, partitions
increase while the result is cached we won't initialize
the offsets of the new partitions.

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

* Add autoscaler leader log patch

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

* Scheduler handle overcommitted pods (knative-extensions#820)

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

* Set consumer and consumergroups finalizers when creating them (knative-extensions#823)

It is possible that a delete consumer or consumergroup might
be reconciled and never finalized when it is deleted before
the finalizer is set.
This happens because the Knative generated reconciler uses
patch (as opposed to using update) for setting the finalizer
and patch doesn't have any optimistic concurrency controls.

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

* Clean up reserved from resources that have been scheduled (knative-extensions#830)

In a recent testing run, we've noticed we have have a scheduled
`ConsumerGroup` [1] (see placements) being considered having
reserved replicas in a different pod [2].

That makes the scheduler think that there is no space but the
autoscaler says we have enough space to hold every virtual
replica.

[1]
```
$ k describe consumergroups -n ks-multi-ksvc-0 c9ee3490-5b4b-4d11-87af-8cb2219d9fe3
Name:         c9ee3490-5b4b-4d11-87af-8cb2219d9fe3
Namespace:    ks-multi-ksvc-0
...
Status:
  Conditions:
    Last Transition Time:  2023-09-06T19:58:27Z
    Reason:                Autoscaler is disabled
    Status:                True
    Type:                  Autoscaler
    Last Transition Time:  2023-09-06T21:41:13Z
    Status:                True
    Type:                  Consumers
    Last Transition Time:  2023-09-06T19:58:27Z
    Status:                True
    Type:                  ConsumersScheduled
    Last Transition Time:  2023-09-06T21:41:13Z
    Status:                True
    Type:                  Ready
  Observed Generation:     1
  Placements:
    Pod Name:      kafka-source-dispatcher-6
    Vreplicas:     4
    Pod Name:      kafka-source-dispatcher-7
    Vreplicas:     4
  Replicas:        8
  Subscriber Uri:  http://receiver5-2.ks-multi-ksvc-0.svc.cluster.local
Events:            <none>
```

[2]
```
    "ks-multi-ksvc-0/c9ee3490-5b4b-4d11-87af-8cb2219d9fe3": {
      "kafka-source-dispatcher-3": 8
    },
```

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>

* Ignore unknown fields in data plane contract (knative-extensions#3335) (knative-extensions#828)

Signed-off-by: Calum Murray <cmurray@redhat.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <pierdipi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Calum Murray <cmurray@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Gencur <mgencur@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Calum Murray <cmurray@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenShift Cherrypick Robot <openshift-cherrypick-robot@redhat.com>
matzew pushed a commit to matzew/eventing-kafka-broker that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/data-plane cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Running the data plane unit tests in the IDE fails
3 participants