This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
[scheduler,mtsource] Implementing EvenSpread HA support across nodes within a zone #593
Labels
Comments
/assign |
@lionelvillard I think we meant "across nodes within a zone" and not "pods" right? |
yes |
aavarghese
changed the title
[scheduler,mtsource] Implementing HA support across pods within a zone (EvenSpread)
[scheduler,mtsource] Implementing EvenSpread HA support across nodes within a zone
Jun 11, 2021
/reopen |
@aavarghese: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no |
github-actions
bot
added
the
lifecycle/stale
Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
label
Dec 21, 2021
/remove-lifecycle stale |
knative-prow-robot
added
triage/accepted
Issues which should be fixed (post-triage)
and removed
lifecycle/stale
Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
labels
Jan 20, 2022
matzew
added a commit
to matzew/eventing-kafka
that referenced
this issue
Apr 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend@redhat.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
Problem
Implementing HA across pods within a zone (# of pods is not static unlike # of zones, so spreading equally may also mean rebalancing)
More info in #587, #463
Persona:
Which persona is this feature for?
Exit Criteria
Vreplicas are evenly spread across pods in each zone (check kafkasource status placement field)
Time Estimate (optional):
How many developer-days do you think this may take to resolve?
Additional context (optional)
Add any other context about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: