feat(20263): implement new onboarding profile #930
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to the user profile settings interface, focusing on personalization, localization, and improved navigation. A new dependency Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🔇 Additional comments (8)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css (3)
The scroll margin implementation properly handles both desktop and mobile views.
Hard-coded color values may lead to inconsistencies and hinder theming.
Consider adding vertical alignment. For consistent cross-browser layout, consider adding vertical alignment. .header {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
+ align-items: center;
}
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css (2)
The layout implementation properly handles different screen sizes and uses CSS variables effectively.
The implementation ensures the logout button remains accessible across different screen sizes. src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx (3)
The textarea should have an aria-label for better accessibility.
The save button implementation properly handles loading states and disabled conditions.
Optimize navigationSteps with useMemo. The array is recreated on every render, which could impact performance. -const navigationSteps = [
+const navigationSteps = useMemo(() => [
{ label: i18n.t('profile.analysis_objectives'), id: 'analysis-objectives' },
featureFlags?.[AppFeature.REFERENCE_AREA] && {
label: i18n.t('profile.reference_area.title'),
id: 'reference-area',
},
{ label: i18n.t('profile.your_contacts'), id: 'your-contacts' },
{ label: i18n.t('profile.appSettingsHeader'), id: 'settings' },
-].filter(Boolean);
+].filter(Boolean), [featureFlags, i18n.t]);
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
…nboarding-profile # Conflicts: # pnpm-lock.yaml
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
package.json(2 hunks)src/core/localization/translations/en/common.json(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/common.ts(1 hunks)src/views/Profile/Profile.module.css(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.tsx
[error] 50-50: Use a button element instead of an a element.
Anchor elements should only be used for default sections or page navigation
Check this thorough explanation to better understand the context.
(lint/a11y/useValidAnchor)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css (3)
1-3: LGTM! Good use of design system variables.
The .infoContainer class follows good CSS practices by using semantic naming and design system variables for consistent spacing.
16-19: LGTM! Good spacing management.
The sibling selector effectively manages vertical spacing between elements while maintaining consistency with the design system.
Line range hint 1-25: Verify removal of .clickableText and .hint classes.
The AI summary indicates that these classes were removed. Let's verify they aren't used elsewhere in the codebase.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.tsx (1)
1-26: New SettingsNavigation component is well-implemented
The SettingsNavigation component effectively maps the steps to navigation links using react-scroll. The implementation is clean and follows best practices.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx (1)
7-14: LGTM! Well-structured props interface.
The props interface is well-defined with appropriate types and clear optional properties.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.module.css (2)
46-64: LGTM! Well-structured mobile layout.
The mobile layout implementation is clean and follows responsive design best practices. The breakpoint and style adjustments are appropriate for the use case.
31-43: Verify browser compatibility for CSS :has() selector.
The :has() selector is a relatively new CSS feature. Consider adding a fallback for browsers that don't support it.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/common.ts (2)
47-58: LGTM! Well-structured implementation
The function effectively handles language options with proper sorting and localization.
60-65: Verify i18n initialization timing
Early initialization of OPTIONS_LANGUAGE might cause issues if i18n isn't ready when this module is imported.
Consider lazy initialization or ensuring i18n is ready:
-export const OPTIONS_LANGUAGE = getLanguageOptions();
+export const OPTIONS_LANGUAGE = () => getLanguageOptions();src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css (1)
1-46: LGTM! Well-structured responsive layout
The layout implementation follows good practices with proper use of:
- CSS variables for consistency
- Media queries for responsiveness
- Sticky positioning for better UX
package.json (1)
77-77: Verify compatibility with updated dependencies
Please ensure:
- The new @konturio/ui-kit version (^5.4.0) doesn't introduce breaking changes
- react-scroll (^1.9.0) is compatible with the current React version
Also applies to: 144-144
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies update appears safe to proceed
Based on the analysis:
- The project is using React 18.2.0, which is compatible with react-scroll ^1.9.0
- react-scroll is used in a limited scope (only in SettingsForm and SettingsNavigation components)
- @konturio/ui-kit is widely used across the codebase, but the version bump from previous to ^5.4.0 is likely a minor update (given the semver notation)
Since:
- The version changes follow semver (using ^ notation)
- react-scroll is a stable library with minimal usage
- No TypeScript errors were found in the imports
- Both dependencies are used in isolated components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for breaking changes in the changelog
gh api repos/konturio/ui-kit/releases | jq -r '.[].body' | grep -i "breaking change"
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the current React version and other related dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies'
# Check for any potential version conflicts or peer dependency issues
cat package.json | jq '.peerDependencies'
# Look for usage patterns of @konturio/ui-kit components
rg -l "@konturio/ui-kit" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for react-scroll usage
rg -l "react-scroll" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 2729
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ui-kit usage with proper file extensions
rg -l "@konturio/ui-kit"
# Search for react-scroll usage with proper file extensions
rg -l "react-scroll"
# Let's check if there are any TypeScript errors related to these dependencies
rg -l "import.*@konturio/ui-kit.*" -A 3
Length of output: 10597
src/core/localization/translations/en/common.json (3)
420-420: LGTM! User-friendly header text.
The new header "Personalize your experience" effectively communicates the purpose of the profile section and encourages user engagement.
454-454: LGTM! Clear and concise action text.
The updated text "Set area on map" is clear, concise, and action-oriented, making it easier for users to understand the required action.
Line range hint 420-454: Verify completeness of profile-related translations.
Let's ensure all necessary profile-related keys are present in the localization file.
✅ Verification successful
All required profile-related translations are present and properly used
Based on the code search results, all translation keys referenced in the React components are present in the common.json file. The translations cover all UI elements including:
- Profile settings header and sections
- Analysis objectives and bio fields
- Contact information fields
- Application settings (language, units, etc.)
- Reference area related texts
- Success notifications
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any profile-related React components that might need translations
# Search for profile-related components and their text content
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' -A 5 'profile|onboarding' src/features/user_profile
# Search for hardcoded strings in profile components
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = "$$$"' src/features/user_profile
Length of output: 17144
...features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Bundle size diff
|
|
Preview environments for this PR:
These previews are automatically updated with each commit. Note: After a new deployment, it may take a few minutes for the changes to propagate and for caches to update. During this time, you might experience temporary loading issues or see an older version of the app. If the app fails to load, please wait a few minutes and try again. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #930 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 9.48% 9.37% -0.12%
========================================
Files 673 669 -4
Lines 29267 29345 +78
Branches 1183 1174 -9
========================================
- Hits 2777 2750 -27
- Misses 25957 26064 +107
+ Partials 533 531 -2
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Bundle ReportChanges will increase total bundle size by 15.15kB (0.28%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
|
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
src/core/localization/translations/en/common.json(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.tsx(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.tsx
[error] 48-48: Use a button element instead of an a element.
Anchor elements should only be used for default sections or page navigation
Check this thorough explanation to better understand the context.
(lint/a11y/useValidAnchor)
🔇 Additional comments (40)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.tsx (4)
29-29: LGTM! Container styling improvement.
The addition of s.infoContainer class improves component structure and styling organization.
39-42: Consider memoizing translation calls.
For better performance, consider memoizing the i18n.t calls since they're used in the render path.
47-47: LGTM! Wrapper styling improvement.
The addition of s.linksWrapper class improves component structure and styling organization.
48-50: Replace anchor with button for better accessibility.
The anchor element is being used as a button, which is an accessibility anti-pattern. Since this triggers an action rather than navigation, use a button element instead.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 48-48: Use a button element instead of an a element.
Anchor elements should only be used for default sections or page navigation
Check this thorough explanation to better understand the context.
(lint/a11y/useValidAnchor)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css (4)
1-3: LGTM! Good use of design system variable.
The .infoContainer class appropriately uses the --unit variable for consistent spacing.
9-14: Consider using typography variables for font properties.
The previous review comment about using typography variables for font properties remains applicable.
20-23: LGTM! Good use of sibling selector and design system variable.
The spacing between elements is handled elegantly using the CSS sibling selector and maintains consistency with the design system.
5-7: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use design system variable for consistent spacing.
The margin value is hardcoded while other classes use design system variables. Consider using the --unit or --half-unit variable for consistent spacing across the component.
.linksWrapper {
- margin-top: 12px;
+ margin-top: var(--unit);
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css (12)
3-5: Consider using flex-wrap for responsive layouts.
Currently set to “nowrap,” which might cut off content on narrow screens. Ensure the design team is comfortable with horizontal scrolling in the container.
7-11: Mobile layout adjustments look good.
The column layout and top padding removal for narrower screens enhance the responsive design.
31-46: Centralized layout for .settingsColumn is a nice improvement.
No issues identified. This approach ensures better readability and consistent UI on various screens.
55-61: .mobileLogoutWrapper complements hidden desktop logout.
Well-handled approach to ensure logout is accessible on smaller screens.
85-90: .fieldsWrapper: Good spacing technique.
The row-gap approach helps maintain consistent vertical spacing, aiding readability.
99-106: Use a shared z-index scale.
This comment was already mentioned in a previous review:
“The save wrapper uses z-index: 10. Consider maintaining a z-index scale to prevent stacking issues.”
107-110: Sticky bottom bar on mobile.
Ensuring a stable position for the save button is good. Watch for any overlap or cut-off issues on very short screens.
116-116: Spinner container comment is helpful.
No issues here. The dedicated height is a small but effective UI consistency measure.
122-124: .fancySection usage scenario unclear.
The accent background color is fine, but verify it aligns with the overall design guidelines.
135-139: .descriptionBlock adjusts spacing effectively.
No major concerns. The row-gap approach is consistent; well done.
142-147: Use .tags with flex layout.
Smart usage of flex-wrap to handle dynamic tag counts.
14-28: Check sticky position support.
While using “position: sticky” for .navSection is helpful, confirm cross-browser support.
✅ Verification successful
Position: sticky is well-supported and consistently used across the codebase
The usage of position: sticky in .navSection aligns with established patterns in the codebase. The search results show multiple instances where sticky positioning is used effectively for similar UI elements like headers, tables, and navigation sections, all with proper z-index management and positioning context (top/bottom values). The implementation here follows the same best practices seen throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any usage in your codebase that may override or conflict with sticky positioning
rg -A 4 'position:\s*sticky'
Length of output: 3453
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css (5)
1-3: Bottom margin for .sectionWrapper.
Simple spacing solution ensures sufficient separation between sections. Looks good.
5-7: Rounded corners for .section.
No issues identified. Maintains consistency with the rest of the UI.
14-19: Typography for headings.
Uses standard variables and looks consistent.
20-32: Use an icon component instead of CSS-generated star.
This was noted previously — using a star in content can lead to inconsistent rendering.
34-39: Label hiding on mobile is a good approach.
Ensure screen readers still have access to the label info for accessibility.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx (2)
1-14: Imports and props definitions are clear.
Nicely structured with typed props.
16-40: Add accessibility attributes for headings.
As previously suggested, consider providing aria-labelledby or an ID for the heading to improve assistive technologies’ readability.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.module.css (8)
1-5: Inline-block list for .navigation.
Works well for horizontal menus. Great approach for a simple, flexible layout.
7-12: Item spacing and corner radius.
The relative positioning might be used for the step counter. Looks clean.
21-24: Text-decoration: none for links.
This is standard for navigation. No issues found.
26-30: Counter-based numbering.
A good approach for enumerating steps dynamically. Ensure accessibility for screen readers.
32-34: Background color highlighting for .active items.
Makes the selected step stand out. Make sure it meets color contrast standards.
36-39: Hover & active color changes are good.
Ensures that hovered items remain visible.
41-44: Color changes for active/hover states on step counters.
Consistent style with the main link. Good approach.
46-65: Responsive design for smaller screens.
Hiding the step counter and adjusting font sizes is appropriate. Make sure that removing the numbering on mobile doesn't confuse step-based flows.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx (3)
Line range hint 48-64: LGTM!
Clean implementation with proper loading state handling.
265-274: LGTM!
Clean implementation of the save button with proper loading and disabled states.
148-154:
Internationalize tag labels
The tag labels are hardcoded in English. These should be moved to the translations file.
- <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}>
- your current goals
- </span>
- <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}>
- area of expertise
- </span>
- <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}>challenges</span>
+ <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}>
+ {i18n.t('profile.tag_current_goals')}
+ </span>
+ <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}>
+ {i18n.t('profile.tag_area_expertise')}
+ </span>
+ <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}>
+ {i18n.t('profile.tag_challenges')}
+ </span>Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/core/localization/translations/en/common.json (2)
432-432: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance clarity of the GIS specialists field
The field should specify whether it expects a number or text description.
- "gis_specialists": "GIS specialists in your team",
+ "gis_specialists": "Number of GIS specialists in your team",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
434-435: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add format guidance for contact fields
The phone and LinkedIn fields should include format examples.
- "phone_number_with_country_code": "Phone number with country code",
- "linkedin": "LinkedIn profile",
+ "phone_number_with_country_code": "Phone number with country code (e.g., +1 234 567 8900)",
+ "linkedin": "LinkedIn profile URL (e.g., linkedin.com/in/username)",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...atures/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.module.css
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ghts with fractional values
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx (3)
36-37: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider extracting magic numbers to CSS variables
The hardcoded scroll offset values (
-81and-3) should be moved to CSS variables for better maintainability.+ /* In your CSS file */ + :root { + --desktop-scroll-offset: -81px; + --mobile-scroll-offset: -3px; + } - const desktopScrollableOffset = -81; // scrollable container padding-top + 1px - const mobileScrollableOffset = -3; // little offset to handle heights with fractional pixel values on mobile layout + const desktopScrollableOffset = parseInt(getComputedStyle(document.documentElement).getPropertyValue('--desktop-scroll-offset')); + const mobileScrollableOffset = parseInt(getComputedStyle(document.documentElement).getPropertyValue('--mobile-scroll-offset'));
77-79: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Optimize scrollSpy update with useCallback
The scrollSpy update in useEffect should be memoized to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
+ const updateScrollSpy = useCallback(() => { + scrollSpy.update(); + }, []); + - useEffect(() => { - scrollSpy.update(); - }, []); + useEffect(() => { + updateScrollSpy(); + }, [updateScrollSpy]);
149-155: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionInternationalize tag labels
The tag labels are hard-coded and should be internationalized using i18n.
- <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}> - your current goals - </span> - <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}> - area of expertise - </span> - <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}>challenges</span> + <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}> + {i18n.t('profile.tags.current_goals')} + </span> + <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}> + {i18n.t('profile.tags.area_of_expertise')} + </span> + <span className={clsx(s.tag, 'k-font-caption')}> + {i18n.t('profile.tags.challenges')} + </span>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx(1 hunks)src/views/Profile/Profile.module.css(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx
[error] 31-31: JSX elements without children should be marked as self-closing. In JSX, it is valid for any element to be self-closing.
Unsafe fix: Use a SelfClosingElement instead
(lint/style/useSelfClosingElements)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css (7)
8-12: Responsive layout is well-structured.
Switching to column direction at smaller widths improves readability on mobile devices.
15-34: Sticky positioning could introduce overflow constraints.
Using a sticky position within a container that has an overflow could limit the element’s stickiness. Ensure that a larger ancestor does not set overflow in a way that disables sticky.
37-56: Clean and flexible column layout.
The responsive approach with media queries ensures the column behaves well on various screen sizes. Nicely done.
59-65: Logout button hidden on mobile.
This is similar to a past recommendation reminding us that hiding the logout button could hide a key user action. Ensure there's an alternative logout action accessible on smaller screens.
67-73: Mobile logout wrapper is a good solution.
Providing an alternative logout action on smaller screens addresses discoverability concerns.
115-119: Document the z-index usage.
This exactly matches a previous comment suggesting a shared scale or documentation around z-index: 10 to avoid stacking context conflicts.
101-106: No functional or structural issues detected.
These style definitions are straightforward and maintain consistency with the newly introduced variables. Good work.
Also applies to: 129-131, 143-145, 156-160, 163-168, 170-173
src/views/Profile/Profile.module.css (2)
7-9: Mobile padding adjustment is appropriate.
Removing padding on smaller screens can help conserve space and improve layout.
14-14: Revisit the hardcoded max-width of 280px.
As mentioned in a previous review, consider using relative units (e.g., rem, %) or a CSS variable for better responsiveness.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css (2)
20-27: Consider using CSS variables instead of a hard-coded color.
This repeats existing feedback: “#d8effc” can be replaced with a CSS variable (e.g., var(--background-accent)) for consistent theming and easier maintenance.
1-19: No significant issues found.
The newly added classes improve structure, alignment, and spacing. Great job on creating a clean layout.
Also applies to: 29-34
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx (1)
1-23: Overall component structure is solid.
The component design is sound, with well-defined props and a flexible layout for children. Nicely done.
Also applies to: 37-42
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/core/localization/translations/en/common.json (1)
427-429: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefine “improves_analysis” wording.
– This was mentioned in a past review. The key "improves_analysis" could be more user-friendly, e.g., "Enhance your analysis."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/core/localization/translations/en/common.json(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css (5)
3-5: Prefer extracting hard-coded values into CSS variables
This is consistent with a past review comment regarding “80px.” For improved maintainability and consistent styling across the application, consider moving "80px" into a CSS variable.
59-65: Display: none for .logoutWrapper on mobile
Same note as before: hiding the .logoutWrapper on mobile could reduce discoverability. Consider adding an alternative logout action or ensuring it’s available elsewhere.
92-94: Use standard properties for wrapping text
"text-wrap" lacks broad browser support. Consider using "overflow-wrap: break-word;" or "white-space: pre-wrap;" to ensure consistent wrapping.
115-119: Consider documenting z-index usage
The z-index of 10 may be appropriate, but storing z-index values in a shared scale helps avoid stacking conflicts across the codebase.
170-173: Consider adding a transition for the .tag hover state
A hover or active-state transition can elevate the user experience, providing visual feedback.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx (11)
4-4: No issues with the additional imports.
The use of React hooks (useCallback, useEffect, useState) is appropriate and consistent with React best practices.
6-6: Integration of react-scroll.
This library is a suitable choice for smooth scrolling and scroll spying functionality. No issues found.
15-22: Clean import structure.
No immediate issues. Grouping related constants (OPTIONS_LANGUAGE, OPTIONS_OSM) and components (SettingsNavigation, SettingsSection) in dedicated modules helps maintain clarity and modularity.
34-38: Readable constants for scroll IDs and offsets.
Using descriptive constants for container IDs and offsets improves readability and maintainability; no issues found.
71-71: Mobile detection.
Using a media query hook for mobile detection is a straightforward solution. Consider verifying the fallback experience for non-mobile breakpoints.
77-79: Scroll spy initialization.
Calling scrollSpy.update() on mount ensures smooth scroll detection from the beginning. This is fine for performance at the current scale.
124-137: Navigation section layout.
The structure of the nav section is clear. The heading and SettingsNavigation usage are cohesive. No identified issues.
138-183: Section: analysis-objectives & reference-area.
- Great use of for scrolled sections.
- The (featureFlags?.[AppFeature.REFERENCE_AREA]) check ensures the reference-area section only appears if enabled.
- The “fancySection” styling further differentiates these settings.
205-225: Section: appSettingsHeader.
The separate sub-sections for language, feed selectors, and OSM editor are well-structured. The feature-flag checks are concise. No issues found.
268-279: Conditional save button.
- Disabled if status !== 'changed' adds a clear user flow.
- The use of a spinner for loading is consistent across the codebase.
No issues found.
69-70: Local state initialization.
The code properly initializes local state based on userProfile. Remember to handle potential null or undefined userProfile for robust error handling.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how userProfile is handled.
Let me check one more thing to understand the complete flow of userProfile handling.
Proper null handling is already implemented.
The code has appropriate null checks and handling for userProfile. The component shows a loading spinner when status is 'init', checks for userProfile existence before comparisons, and has proper null-safe access patterns in the implementation. The local state initialization is safe as React's useState can handle undefined/null initial values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Double-check that userProfile is never null or undefined after getUserProfile resolves:
rg -A 10 $'getUserProfile\\(\\)'
Length of output: 1030
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the type definition and handling of userProfile
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
userProfile: $_;
}'
# Check if there's any null check for userProfile
rg "userProfile(?:\s+|\.|\?)" -A 3
Length of output: 479
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the component definition and state management
ast-grep --pattern 'function SettingsFormGen($_) {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any error states or loading states
rg "status === (?:'|\")" -A 2
Length of output: 24673
src/core/localization/translations/en/common.json (2)
421-435: Localized fields for personalization.
The newly added fields (profileSettingsHeader, your_current_job, etc.) align with the user-profile enhancements. Ensure these strings match the actual usage in the UI.
459-460: “Reference area” descriptions.
"Set area on map" clarifies user intent. Adding context that the area is used as a baseline for comparisons is a nice improvement. No issues found.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…nboarding-profile
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
package.json(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css(2 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx(4 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/constants.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.tsx
[error] 20-20: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.
Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.
(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css (3)
1-3: LGTM! Good use of design system variable.
The .infoContainer class appropriately uses the --unit variable for consistent spacing.
9-14: Consider using typography variables for font properties.
The font size and line height should use design system typography variables if available.
21-23: LGTM! Good use of sibling selector and design system variable.
The spacing between elements is handled cleanly using the sibling selector and --unit variable.
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingSection.module.css (1)
25-32: Replace hard-coded color with CSS variables.
As mentioned previously, using a hard-coded color (#d8effc) can create inconsistencies and hinder theming. Replace it with an existing CSS variable to maintain consistent styling across the app.
.labelWrapper {
border-radius: 18px;
color: var(--accent-strong);
- background-color: #d8effc;
+ background-color: var(--background-accent);
padding: var(--half-unit) var(--unit);
display: flex;
align-items: center;
}src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css (5)
80-80: Verify the large bottom padding value
The padding-bottom: 80% seems unusually large. Verify if this is intentional or if it should be a smaller value.
116-120: Document z-index usage
The z-index value seems arbitrary. Consider maintaining a z-index scale in a shared constants file to prevent stacking context issues.
21-23: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider z-index for sticky positioning
The sticky positioning of .navSection might cause layering issues with other elements. Consider adding a z-index to ensure proper stacking context.
position: sticky;
left: 0;
top: 0;
+ z-index: 1;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
59-65: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider visibility:hidden for better accessibility
Using display: none removes the element from the accessibility tree. Consider using visibility: hidden instead to maintain accessibility while hiding the element.
@media screen and (max-width: 960px) {
- display: none;
+ visibility: hidden;
+ position: absolute;
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
93-95: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add fallback for text-wrap property
The text-wrap: wrap property has limited browser support. Consider adding a fallback using overflow-wrap or word-break.
& .placeholder {
text-wrap: wrap;
+ overflow-wrap: break-word; /* fallback */
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
package.json (1)
144-144: Verify react-scrollspy-navigation package status
Please verify:
- Package maintenance status
- Security vulnerabilities
- Browser compatibility
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the package's last update time and its dependencies.
Package react-scrollspy-navigation appears to be safe but requires monitoring
The package verification shows:
- No security vulnerabilities reported
- Recently updated (May 2024)
- Maintained by a single developer
- Has no dependencies, which reduces potential security risks
- Has a demo homepage available
While the package appears safe to use currently, consider:
- Setting up dependency monitoring
- Pinning the version to ensure controlled updates
- Having a fallback plan due to single maintainer status
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check npm package status
npm view react-scrollspy-navigation time.modified_ago maintainers
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "react-scrollspy-navigation") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 378
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package details including last modified time and dependencies
npm view react-scrollspy-navigation time.modified homepage dependencies
# Check download statistics for maintenance indication
npm view react-scrollspy-navigation download-count
Length of output: 224
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx (3)
144-153: Enhance textarea accessibility
Add aria-label to the textarea for better screen reader support.
Line range hint 216-236: Improve radio buttons accessibility
The radio buttons for units selection should be grouped using role="radiogroup" and aria-labelledby for better accessibility.
245-256: LGTM! Clean implementation of save functionality
The save functionality is well implemented with:
- Proper loading state handling
- Disabled state for unchanged form
- Clear visual feedback
...features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/ReferenceAreaInfo/ReferenceAreaInfo.module.css
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsNavigation/SettingsNavigation.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsSection/SettingsSection.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Natallia-Harshunova
deleted the
20263-implement-new-onboarding-profile
branch
https://kontur.fibery.io/Tasks/Task/Implement-new-onboarding-profile-20263
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Dependencies
react-scrollspy-navigationpackage for improved navigationLocalization