Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(20430): show analytics section by feature #974

Conversation

Natallia-Harshunova
Copy link
Contributor

@Natallia-Harshunova Natallia-Harshunova commented Feb 5, 2025

https://kontur.fibery.io/Tasks/Task/FE-Split-Bio-field-in-profile-to-Objectives-and-Bio-20430

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the settings form so that the "analysis objectives" step and its corresponding section are shown only when the feature flag is enabled, ensuring a dynamic user experience.

@Natallia-Harshunova Natallia-Harshunova requested review from alesiahil and a team February 5, 2025 14:06
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes modify the conditional rendering of the analysis-objectives step in the user profile settings form. The navigationSteps array now includes the analysis-objectives step only when the LLM_ANALYTICS feature flag is enabled. Similarly, the SettingsSection component for analysis-objectives is conditionally rendered based on the same flag. These adjustments alter the control flow within the settings form without modifying the exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx Added conditional rendering for the analysis-objectives step in both the navigation steps array and the SettingsSection component, based on the LLM_ANALYTICS feature flag.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant SF as SettingsForm
    participant FF as Feature Flag Checker (LLM_ANALYTICS)

    SF->>FF: Check if LLM_ANALYTICS enabled?
    alt Enabled
        FF-->>SF: True
        SF->>SF: Render navigation step for analysis-objectives
        SF->>SF: Render SettingsSection for analysis-objectives
    else Disabled
        FF-->>SF: False
        SF->>SF: Skip rendering of analysis-objectives elements
    end
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit, hopping with glee,
Code changes setting new features free.
Analysis steps appear with a flag so bright,
If disabled, they vanish out of sight.
A little conditional dance—oh what a delight!
🐰✨ Happy coding day and night!

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Language To Recheck Fuzzy Untranslated Total
ar 3 24 101 128
de 2 24 101 127
es 3 24 101 128
id 2 24 101 127
ko 3 24 101 128
uk 0 7 8 15

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Bundle size diff

Old size New size Diff
5.17 MB 5.17 MB 34 B (0.00%)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 31 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 10.02%. Comparing base (3638bc1) to head (d75c5a5).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...r_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx 0.00% 31 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (25.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (1.13%) is below the target coverage (15.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #974      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   10.02%   10.02%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         669      669              
  Lines       29471    29475       +4     
  Branches     1236     1236              
==========================================
  Hits         2954     2954              
- Misses      25987    25991       +4     
  Partials      530      530              
Components Coverage Δ
UI Components 0.26% <ø> (ø)
Core Logic 17.81% <ø> (ø)
Features 1.13% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Utilities 45.49% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3638bc1 and d75c5a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx (2)

34-37: LGTM! Consistent feature flag implementation.

The navigation step for analysis objectives is correctly gated behind the LLM_ANALYTICS feature flag, following the same pattern as other feature-flagged steps.


122-157: LGTM! Feature flag implementation is consistent.

The analytics section is properly gated behind the LLM_ANALYTICS feature flag, matching the navigation implementation.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 34 bytes (0.0%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes
Bundle name Size Change
konturio/disaster-ninja-fe-esm 5.42MB 34 bytes (0.0%) ⬆️

Affected Assets, Files, and Routes:

view changes for bundle: konturio/disaster-ninja-fe-esm

Assets Changed:

Asset Name Size Change Total Size Change (%)
assets/index-*.js -5 bytes 180.48kB -0.0%
assets/App-*.js -5 bytes 27.58kB -0.02%
assets/Profile-*.js 44 bytes 14.84kB 0.3%

Files in assets/Profile-*.js:

  • ./src/features/user_profile/components/SettingsForm/SettingsForm.tsx → Total Size: 11.01kB

@Natallia-Harshunova Natallia-Harshunova merged commit 2bf3d90 into main Feb 6, 2025
15 of 22 checks passed
@Natallia-Harshunova Natallia-Harshunova deleted the 20430-fe-split-bio-field-in-profile-to-objectives-and-bio branch February 6, 2025 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants