✨ Add ActionsColumn to Job Functions table

[DvoraShechter1]

Update the Actions column in the Job Functions table to use PatternFly 5 controls, replacing the PatternFly 4 controls.
Relates to #1318

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.98%. Comparing base (b654645) to head (0fd7e0a).
Report is 243 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2101      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   39.20%   41.98%   +2.78%     
==========================================
  Files         146      175      +29     
  Lines        4857     5630     +773     
  Branches     1164     1395     +231     
==========================================
+ Hits         1904     2364     +460     
- Misses       2939     3145     +206     
- Partials       14      121     +107     

Flag	Coverage Δ
client	41.98% <ø> (+2.78%)	⬆️
server	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rszwajko]

Code looks good! Some minor comments:

1. mixing links and text in the issue description (first post in the Conversation view) is problematic - in our process the message will be used as the git commit message (which is plain text). A good solution is to list links below the description i.e. see 🌱 Update project to use nodejs 20, npm >=10.5.2 (#2062) #2064 or ✨ Use InfiniteScroller pattern for the Task Drawer #2049
2. note that part of your description (like in the [Stakeholder](https://127.0.0.1/controls/stakeholders) table ) is not accurate - currently (with PR ✨ Update stakeholder groups table to use ActionsColumn #2095 and ✨ Update stakeholders table to use ActionsColumn #1923) we have both stakeholders tables fixed.
3. you can use [WIP] prefix as a way to indicate work-in-progress but GitHub has nice draft PR functionality (check "convert to draft" link below reviewers list)
   

[rszwajko]

LGTM!

Concerns were addressed.

[mguetta1]

LGTM