webhook: support elasticquota enable update resource key

[lijunxin559]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Currently, the consistency check for resource types in elastic quota's add, delete and update is insufficient and too rigid. For example, maxResourceKey requires parent-child consistency, which can lead to the following problems:

1. There is no unified logic to check the various resource types of min/max, which can easily lead to inconsistencies
2. Unable to flexibly support changing resource types, especially when adding new resources, limited by the initial creation status

However, considering the original intention of quota design and current computing logic, it does not affect related calculations while supporting resource type checks(also already added more unitTest cases). Among them:

1. The setting intentions of min and max are different and the calculation logic is not dependent. The resource types need to be checked separately
2. Guaranteed is affected by min calculation, so there is no need to check separately

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

I propose to add a feature called ElasticQuotaEnableUpdateResourceKey to support changes to ElasticQuota Resource Key, with the following modifications:

1. Support min and max resourceKey checks during elasticQuota add and update: checkSubAndParentGroupQuotaKey()
2. Propose standard process operations for elastic quota resourceKey: add resourceKey from parent node to child node, delete resourceKey from child node to parent node

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in make test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 79.48718% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 66.08%. Comparing base (6f6ef82) to head (01bf3f6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/webhook/elasticquota/quota_topology_check.go	79.48%	5 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2323      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.09%   66.08%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         458      458              
  Lines       54197    54230      +33     
==========================================
+ Hits        35823    35838      +15     
- Misses      15801    15818      +17     
- Partials     2573     2574       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	66.08% <79.48%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.