Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade firebase-functions from 4.2.0 to 6.1.0 #88

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

korturpazar
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 6 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • firestore-counter/functions/package.json
  • firestore-counter/functions/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-7925106
  666  
high severity Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
SNYK-JS-BODYPARSER-7926860
  624  
medium severity Open Redirect
SNYK-JS-EXPRESS-6474509
  519  
medium severity Cross-site Scripting
SNYK-JS-EXPRESS-7926867
  469  
low severity Cross-site Scripting
SNYK-JS-SEND-7926862
  319  
low severity Cross-site Scripting
SNYK-JS-SERVESTATIC-7926865
  319  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Open Redirect
🦉 Cross-site Scripting
🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants