Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refine evaluation of flags #5

Closed
kosarev opened this issue Oct 31, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Refine evaluation of flags #5

kosarev opened this issue Oct 31, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@kosarev
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@kosarev
Copy link
Owner

kosarev commented Oct 31, 2020

For every flag give each way of computing its value a separate function, so it can be seen how ways for each flag do we have and what values they depend on. This is supposed to simplify further analysis of relevant logic.
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine evaluation of flags for ALU ADDs.
245034a
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine evaluation of flags for ALU ADC instructions.
3c0dab8
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Combine execution of i8080 ALU ADD and ADC instructions.
6eb9cbb
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine evaluation of flags for ALU SUB and CP instructions.
f967881
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine evaluation of half-carry flags.
51b2524
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine evaluation of flags for ALU SBC instructions.
21f65bb
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Combine execution of i8080 ALU SUB, CP and SBC instructions.
7df2a52
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine evaluation of flags for ALU AND/OR/XOR instructions.
c86f38f
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine evaluation of flags for ALU AND instructions.
f21281b
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Refine once again evaluation of flags for ALU AND/OR/XOR instruc…
375c7a8 
…tions.
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Give each way of evaluating ALU instruction flags a separate fun…
6fb2026 
…ction.
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Generalise flags evaluation for XOR and OR.
7f2560c
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Introduce a common function for evaluating flags.
a090d1a
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for SUB, CP and SBC.
4f8350c
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for AND/OR/XOR.
56f84dc
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Move out calling the flag-evaluation function.
dd86bd0
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Combine handling of ADD/ADC and SUB/CP/SBC.
3f9ae4a
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Generalise handling of ALU instructions.
3be86ab
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Simplify computations.
7f79284
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for ADD rp, rp.
fbe70dd
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for CMC.
c6f9aed
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for STC.
b7162a4
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for RAL.
6f43721
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for RAR.
83e6aa8
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for RLC.
c6ab72f
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for RRC.
aaaaf6e
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for DEC r.
57adbc1
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for INC r.
dfb8004
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Use the new flag-computing function for DAA.
b2d6498
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Optimise computing HF for INC and DEC.
773c075
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Unify computing HF.
aa34da3
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Unify computing flags for INC and DEC.
7dc91bf
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Unify computing flags for INC and DEC.
54fe2d0
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Simplify executing INC and DEC.
3c0ad53
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Do not evaluate XF and YF for i8080.
b509ece
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Do not evaluate NF for i8080.
4171bf4
kosarev added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev
[#5] Do not maintain NF on i8080.
4985cc4
@kosarev kosarev self-assigned this Nov 8, 2020
@kosarev kosarev mentioned this issue Nov 8, 2020
Open
@kosarev kosarev closed this as completed Nov 8, 2020
@ToniWestbrook ToniWestbrook mentioned this issue Aug 5, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kosarev kosarev

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kosarev