Skip to content
Python

GH-44273: [C++][Decimal] Use 0E+1 not 0.E+1 for broader compatibility #2826

Sign in to view logs

GH-44273: [C++][Decimal] Use 0E+1 not 0.E+1 for broader compatibility

GH-44273: [C++][Decimal] Use 0E+1 not 0.E+1 for broader compatibility #2826

Triggered via push October 1, 2024 01:38
@koukou
pushed bfc672f
cpp-decimal-not-omit-fractional
Status Success
Total duration 47m 51s
Artifacts –

python.yml

on: push
Matrix: docker
Matrix: macos
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

4 errors
ARM64 macOS 14 Python 3
No available formula with the name "llvm@19". Did you mean llvm@9, llvm, llvm@17, llvm@16, llvm@15, llvm@14, llvm@13, llvm@12 or llvm@11?
ARM64 macOS 14 Python 3
No available formula with the name "llvm@19". Did you mean llvm@9, llvm, llvm@17, llvm@16, llvm@15, llvm@14, llvm@13, llvm@12 or llvm@11?
AMD64 macOS 13 Python 3
No available formula with the name "llvm@19". Did you mean llvm@9, llvm, llvm@17, llvm@16, llvm@15, llvm@14, llvm@13, llvm@12 or llvm@11?
AMD64 macOS 13 Python 3
No available formula with the name "llvm@19". Did you mean llvm@9, llvm, llvm@17, llvm@16, llvm@15, llvm@14, llvm@13, llvm@12 or llvm@11?