-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(validator): remove the limit of validator subcommand amount flag #290
Conversation
Since the validator subcommand amount flag had a type of uint64, the flag was limited to a maximum value of about 18 ETH. By changing the type of the amount flag to string, it is possible to use unlimited values for the flag.
WalkthroughThe recent update transitions the handling of transaction amounts from a Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- kroma-validator/cmd/balance/cmd.go (5 hunks)
- kroma-validator/cmd/main.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
kroma-validator/cmd/main.go (2)
37-37
: The change fromUint64Flag
toStringFlag
for theamount
parameter in thedeposit
command aligns with the PR objectives. Ensure that theDeposit
function correctly parses the string value to a numeric type for further processing.
49-49
: The change fromUint64Flag
toStringFlag
for theamount
parameter in thewithdraw
command is appropriate. Ensure that theWithdraw
function correctly handles the string value by parsing it to a numeric type.kroma-validator/cmd/balance/cmd.go (3)
20-20
: Fetching theamount
parameter as a string in theDeposit
function aligns with the PR objectives. Ensure that thesendTransaction
function correctly handles the string value.
40-45
: The handling of theamount
parameter as a string in theWithdraw
function, including parsing it to abig.Int
and appropriate error handling, is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives.
91-106
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [82-97]
Accepting the
txValue
parameter as a string in thesendTransaction
function and parsing it to abig.Int
with appropriate error handling is a necessary change that aligns with the PR objectives.
Description
Since the validator subcommand amount flag had a type of uint64, the flag was limited to a maximum value of about 18 ETH. By changing the type of the amount flag to string, it is possible to use unlimited values for the flag.
Summary by CodeRabbit
deposit
andwithdraw
commands to accept string inputs, allowing for more flexible and precise transactions.