Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(contracts): upgrade validator system in Colosseum #309

Conversation

seolaoh
Copy link
Contributor

@seolaoh seolaoh commented Apr 21, 2024

Description

Implemented validator system upgrade from using ValidatorPool to using ValidatorManager in Colosseum.

Since some bugs are found in ValidatorManager and AssetManager, fixed them appropriately. I recommend to review this PR commit by commit because it includes some refactoring.

@seolaoh seolaoh self-assigned this Apr 21, 2024
@seolaoh seolaoh requested a review from a team as a code owner April 21, 2024 14:36
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please add the base/target branch pattern to the list of additional branches to be reviewed in the settings.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Pangssu
Copy link
Contributor

Pangssu commented Apr 22, 2024

Add a validation process for _minSlashingAmount to constructor.

@seolaoh
Copy link
Contributor Author

seolaoh commented Apr 23, 2024

Add a validation process for _minSlashingAmount to constructor.

What do you mean for a validation process? To check what?

@seolaoh seolaoh force-pushed the feat/upgrade-validator-system-colosseum branch from bc2a2d8 to 1392622 Compare April 23, 2024 05:28
@seolaoh seolaoh requested review from 0xHansLee and Pangssu April 23, 2024 05:29
@Pangssu
Copy link
Contributor

Pangssu commented Apr 23, 2024

Add a validation process for _minSlashingAmount to constructor.

What do you mean for a validation process? To check what?

Ignore it. I realised that it can't check it in the AssetManager contract. _minSlashingAmount <= ValidatorManager.MIN_START_AMOUNT

@seolaoh seolaoh force-pushed the feat/upgrade-validator-system-colosseum branch from 1392622 to 10be0bf Compare April 24, 2024 05:33
@seolaoh seolaoh requested review from sm-stack and 0xHansLee and removed request for 0xHansLee April 24, 2024 05:34
Copy link
Contributor

@0xHansLee 0xHansLee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@sm-stack sm-stack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@seolaoh seolaoh force-pushed the feat/upgrade-validator-system-colosseum branch from 10be0bf to e3c1b38 Compare April 26, 2024 00:45
@0xHansLee 0xHansLee merged commit 16802c3 into feat/implement-validator-system-v2 Apr 29, 2024
2 checks passed
@0xHansLee 0xHansLee deleted the feat/upgrade-validator-system-colosseum branch April 29, 2024 07:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants