Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add WG AutoML #358

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 10, 2020
Merged

Add WG AutoML #358

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 10, 2020

Conversation

andreyvelich
Copy link
Member

@andreyvelich andreyvelich commented Jul 8, 2020

I added AutoML WG.

Person WG Response
@animeshsingh KFServing, Pipelines LGTM
@cliveseldon KFServing
@yuzisun KFServing
@ellistarn KFServing  
@neuromage Pipelines/Metadata  
@paveldournov Pipelines/Metadata  
@elikatsis Pipelines  
@vpavlin Control plane LGTM
@yanniszark Control Plane/common services
@Jeffwan Control Plane
@krishnadurai Common Services  
@terrytangyuan Training LGTM
@gaocegege Training LGTM
@jlewi Training
@johnugeorge Training  LGTM
@aronchick Metadata
@StefanoFioravanzo Metadata
@jbottum PM  
@elviraux PM  
@kimwnasptd Notebooks
@krazyhaas   LGTM

@kubeflow-bot
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@gaocegege gaocegege left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@jlewi
Copy link
Contributor

jlewi commented Jul 10, 2020

Why are training and autoML two different working groups as opposed to sub projects within in one working group?

What is the overlap in terms of:

  • Scope
  • Technologies
  • People involved

@gaocegege
Copy link
Member

@jlewi Ref #356 (comment)

@jlewi
Copy link
Contributor

jlewi commented Jul 13, 2020

Thanks @gaocegege @andreyvelich I replied on #356 lets continue the discussion there.

@andreyvelich
Copy link
Member Author

I have added meeting time (10 am UTC second Wednesday, 4 pm UTC fourth Wednesday).
Does it work for you @gaocegege @johnugeorge @sperlingxx @czheng94 @terrytangyuan @Jeffwan ?

@jlewi
Copy link
Contributor

jlewi commented Jul 22, 2020

@andreyvelich Are we planning on having 1 WG for training and automl? If so which PR are we going to use?

@andreyvelich
Copy link
Member Author

I removed WIP status, since we decided to move forward with 2 WG: Training and AutoML.
It would be great if this PR can be reviewed by some folks from other WGs.

@andreyvelich andreyvelich changed the title [WIP] Add WG AutoML Add WG AutoML Aug 4, 2020
@sperlingxx
Copy link
Member

I have added meeting time (10 am UTC second Wednesday, 4 pm UTC fourth Wednesday).
Does it work for you @gaocegege @johnugeorge @sperlingxx @czheng94 @terrytangyuan @Jeffwan ?

This time looks good to me.

Copy link
Member

@gaocegege gaocegege left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@terrytangyuan terrytangyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vpavlin
Copy link
Member

vpavlin commented Aug 6, 2020

/lgtm

@johnugeorge
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@krazyhaas
Copy link

lgtm

@animeshsingh
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@jlewi
Copy link
Contributor

jlewi commented Aug 10, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jlewi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d75d8ec into kubeflow:master Aug 10, 2020
@andreyvelich andreyvelich deleted the automl-wg branch January 17, 2024 15:05
tarilabs added a commit to tarilabs/kubeflow-community that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
according to KF process the Charter is to be submitted _after_:
> Add WG-related docs like charter.md, schedules, roadmaps, etc. to your new kubeflow/community/wg-foo directory once the above PR is merged

from here: https://github.com/kubeflow/community/blob/master/wgs/wg-lifecycle.md#:~:text=Add%20WG%2Drelated%20docs%20like%20charter.md%2C%20schedules%2C%20roadmaps%2C%20etc.%20to%20your%20new%20kubeflow/community/wg%2Dfoo%20directory%20once%20the%20above%20PR%20is%20merged

The group however pointed out in more recent WGs creation the Charter was submitted with the WG creation PR.
example: kubeflow#358

Therefore, advancing Charter proposal at once in this PR.
@tarilabs tarilabs mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2024
tarilabs added a commit to tarilabs/kubeflow-community that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
according to KF process the Charter is to be submitted _after_:
> Add WG-related docs like charter.md, schedules, roadmaps, etc. to your new kubeflow/community/wg-foo directory once the above PR is merged

from here: https://github.com/kubeflow/community/blob/master/wgs/wg-lifecycle.md#:~:text=Add%20WG%2Drelated%20docs%20like%20charter.md%2C%20schedules%2C%20roadmaps%2C%20etc.%20to%20your%20new%20kubeflow/community/wg%2Dfoo%20directory%20once%20the%20above%20PR%20is%20merged

The group however pointed out in more recent WGs creation the Charter was submitted with the WG creation PR.
example: kubeflow#358

Therefore, advancing Charter proposal at once in this PR.
tarilabs added a commit to tarilabs/kubeflow-community that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
according to KF process the Charter is to be submitted _after_:
> Add WG-related docs like charter.md, schedules, roadmaps, etc. to your new kubeflow/community/wg-foo directory once the above PR is merged

from here: https://github.com/kubeflow/community/blob/master/wgs/wg-lifecycle.md#:~:text=Add%20WG%2Drelated%20docs%20like%20charter.md%2C%20schedules%2C%20roadmaps%2C%20etc.%20to%20your%20new%20kubeflow/community/wg%2Dfoo%20directory%20once%20the%20above%20PR%20is%20merged

The group however pointed out in more recent WGs creation the Charter was submitted with the WG creation PR.
example: kubeflow#358

Therefore, advancing Charter proposal at once in this PR.

Signed-off-by: tarilabs <matteo.mortari@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.