-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 442
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Katib 2019 Roadmap #348
Katib 2019 Roadmap #348
Conversation
/assign @YujiOshima |
ROADMAP.md
Outdated
* Multi-Tenancy Support | ||
* NAS | ||
* Batch scheduling | ||
* Integration with Pipelines |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am working on it now
/lgtm |
Fixes: #318 |
ROADMAP.md
Outdated
* Enhance metrics collection | ||
* May need to revisit the design - use a push model instead of pull model? | ||
* UI enhancements: allowing data scientists to visualize results easier | ||
* [TODO] What to do about Data? Need to figure out a long term story for the model DB |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I want to refer data model of ml-metadata https://github.com/google/ml-metadata .
It must be nice if katib integrate with ml-metadata.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That seems interesting. Does anyone know how mature this project is? It seems pretty new from the commit history.
ROADMAP.md
Outdated
Integration with KF distributed training components | ||
* TFJob | ||
* PyTorch | ||
* Allow Katib to support other operator types generically |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any plan/discussion/issue on this? It might be good to test this with mpi-operator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@YujiOshima @johnugeorge @hougangliu Please take a look again. |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: richardsliu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Adding an initial draft for katib's 2019 roadmap. Feedbacks are welcome.
This change is