-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 448
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix worker error silent #863
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/assign @johnugeorge
} | ||
cmd.Wait() | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we use the third-party tool such as https://github.com/hpcloud/tail?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool, I can update it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do you signal the completion of tail logs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we doesn't need know the completion of tail logs, when the worker container exit, metrics collector main process will start to collect and parse the file, and then exit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just wondering if there is a chance to miss certain worker container logs in this case.
Shall we add a failure e2e test to test failed cases? |
Sure, I can try to add one in another PR |
Please rebase when #861 is merged |
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ func wrapWorkerContainer(pod *v1.Pod, jobKind, metricsFile string, mc common.Met | |||
if c.Args != nil { | |||
args = append(args, c.Args...) | |||
} | |||
redirectStr := fmt.Sprintf(" 2>&1 | tee %s", metricsFile) | |||
redirectStr := fmt.Sprintf("1>%s 2>&1", metricsFile) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do we let users know that kubectl logs
works on the side car which outputs logs from worker container too? Should we rename the side car container to "logger" or something?
WDYT? @gaocegege @hougangliu
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM
/test kubeflow-katib-presubmit |
Needs a reabse. |
rebased already. It seems CI starts to strike now again |
/test kubeflow-katib-presubmit |
1 similar comment
/test kubeflow-katib-presubmit |
@gaocegege @johnugeorge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
I think we already set it to 3 in test |
ok |
/assign @johnugeorge |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: johnugeorge The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note:
This change is