Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubeflow 1.10 Enterprise grade Agenda #2727

Open
7 tasks done
Tracked by #2763
juliusvonkohout opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 7 comments
Open
7 tasks done
Tracked by #2763

Kubeflow 1.10 Enterprise grade Agenda #2727

juliusvonkohout opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

Validation Checklist

Version

master

Describe your issue

For general Kubeflow:

Security:

For Pipelines maybe :

Good first issues

Steps to reproduce the issue

Install Kubeflow

Put here any screenshots or videos (optional)

No response

@rimolive
Copy link
Member

rimolive commented Jun 4, 2024

Can we work on an alternative Container Registry to overcome the Docker Hub rate limit issues?

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member Author

@rimolive Yes, @thesuperzapper wants ghcr if I remember correctly and I also think that GitHub itself as registry might be a good choice.

@andreyvelich
Copy link
Member

I think, we should discuss pros and cons to use Docker Hub vs ghcr.
Since we can ask CNCF for subscription for Docker Hub account for our official Kubeflow DockerHub: https://hub.docker.com/orgs/kubeflow, it might solve an issue with Docker Hub rate limits. It gives 5000 pulls per day for every user.

@kimwnasptd
Copy link
Member

@juliusvonkohout should we also warm up again the discussion about groups support, now that the first step of oauth2-proxy is merged and we are passing id-tokens on requests?

kubeflow/kubeflow#4188
kubeflow/kubeflow#7085

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member Author

@juliusvonkohout should we also warm up again the discussion about groups support, now that the first step of oauth2-proxy is merged and we are passing id-tokens on requests?

kubeflow/kubeflow#4188 kubeflow/kubeflow#7085

Yes please :-) Lets discuss it in the Kubeflow platform/manifests meeting. We really have to think the architecture trough.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member Author

/lifecycle frozen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: To Do
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants