Add seaweedfs to contrib

[pschoen-itsc]

Pull Request Template for Kubeflow manifests Issues

✏️ A brief description of the changes

I added seaweedfs to contrib which could be a replacement for minio

📦 List any dependencies that are required for this change

🐛 If this PR is related to an issue, please put the link to the issue here.

✅ Contributor checklist

• Make sure you have tested with kustomize. See Installation Prerequisites
• All the commits have been signed-off (To pass the DCO check)
• Submit the Contributor License Agreements (To pass the cla/google check)

---

You can join the CNCF Slack and access our meetings at the Kubeflow Community website. Our channel on the CNCF Slack is here #kubeflow-platform.

[juliusvonkohout]

/ok-to-test

[juliusvonkohout]

And first of all thank you very much for the PR.

[juliusvonkohout]

This is a follow up of the discussion in kubeflow/pipelines#10998

[pschoen-itsc]

One current problem is getting an artifact via the Artifacts view in the UI. mlpipeline-ui crashes because of a missing region parameter in the js minio client. Not sure why this problem appears when using seaweedfs, because there is no change in configuration there.

[juliusvonkohout]

/ok-to-test

[pschoen-itsc]

Pipeline should succeed now.

[juliusvonkohout]

@pschoen-itsc shall I review this for merging or do you want to continue with the user management in the same PR? Please also check kubeflow/pipelines#10998 (comment).

[pschoen-itsc]

@pschoen-itsc shall I review this for merging or do you want to continue with the user management in the same PR? Please also check kubeflow/pipelines#10998 (comment).

You can review this. I think it is better to do the user management in a different PR.

[juliusvonkohout]

Somehow https://github.com/kubeflow/manifests/actions/runs/11101539942/job/30958766562 failed. If it fails on the rerun again we have to fix this first before merging.

[juliusvonkohout]

Maybe a rebase to master is helpful as well, because some tests and scripts changed with the latest commit yesterday.

[juliusvonkohout]

Yes, a rebase is necessary.

[pschoen-itsc]

Yes, a rebase is necessary.

Will do it today.

[juliusvonkohout]

/lgtm
/approve

Thank you very much. For the user management we will also need some tests to make sure that they cannot access other users artifacts. We also need to verify that the artifacts work in the UI.

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: juliusvonkohout

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [juliusvonkohout]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment