Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Will pipelines support the same behavior as argo retry #1198

Closed
cheyang opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 10 comments
Closed

Will pipelines support the same behavior as argo retry #1198

cheyang opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/backend help wanted The community is welcome to contribute. kind/feature lifecycle/stale The issue / pull request is stale, any activities remove this label. priority/p0

Comments

@cheyang
Copy link
Contributor

cheyang commented Apr 22, 2019

I'm wondering if pipelines will support the behavior of argo retry. The benefit of doing this is to avoid rerun the successful step, only starting from the failed step without the end user input.

@cheyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

cheyang commented Apr 23, 2019

/assign @vicaire

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Apr 23, 2019

Yes, we can support this if it is not already supported. Would you like to contribute the change?

@cheyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

cheyang commented Apr 23, 2019

I'd like to contribute!

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Apr 24, 2019

I have assigned this item to you. Thanks!

@xiaogaozi
Copy link

@cheyang May I ask, is there any progress about this feature?

@cheyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

cheyang commented Jun 19, 2019

I didn't have chance to work on it. @xiaogaozi , if you'd like to pick it, it will be great. Thanks.

@IronPan
Copy link
Member

IronPan commented Aug 13, 2019

#1720 should cover it.

@pepnova-9
Copy link

pepnova-9 commented Nov 7, 2019

Is it possible to use the retry the pipeline API (#1720) from kfp? If not, is there a way to retry pipeline like argo retry on kubeflow currentrly?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 25, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the lifecycle/stale The issue / pull request is stale, any activities remove this label. label Jun 25, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 2, 2020

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Please comment "/reopen" to reopen it.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 2, 2020
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2023
* Add github action for new images

* Update configmap for 0.5

* Generate v0.5.0 rc0 manifest

* Add github action for new images

* Update configmap for 0.5

* Generate v0.5.0 rc0 manifest

* Update release yaml

* Update multi model server flag

* Add triton check for MMS

* fix version

* Fix pmml release version

* Remove ephemeralContainers

* Update 0.5.0-rc0 yaml

* Remove KFS version check for quick install

* Rename pmml-docker-publiish.yml to pmml-docker-publish.yml
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/backend help wanted The community is welcome to contribute. kind/feature lifecycle/stale The issue / pull request is stale, any activities remove this label. priority/p0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants