Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Arrikto EKF distribution #2639

Closed
shannonbradshaw opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2641
Closed

Add Arrikto EKF distribution #2639

shannonbradshaw opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2641

Comments

@shannonbradshaw
Copy link
Contributor

Would like to add Arrikto's Enterprise Kubeflow distribution under "docs/Distributions" and in the table of distros on the getting-started/installation page.

@rui-vas
Copy link
Contributor

rui-vas commented Apr 22, 2021

While Arrikto's effort to push Kubeflow v1.3 out the door deserves a lot of merit, I would like to have a community decision on the topic as it adds a proprietary distribution with no way for a user to try aside from asking for a commercial demo/quote.

@animeshsingh @aronchick @thesuperzapper @Bobgy any thoughts on this?

@thesuperzapper
Copy link
Member

There are two points here:

First, I dont really want to add more distribution docs to kubeflow.org, as I want to see them move to vendor websites, see issue #2629.

Second, I dont see any reason not to link them under the "Installing Kubeflow" section for now. But clearly, once we setup a verification process they would be required to undertake the same process as any other distribution. (Whatever verification the governance group of Kubeflow decides to impose)

@cvenets
Copy link

cvenets commented Apr 22, 2021

@RFMVasconcelos I don't see a reason to exclude specifically this distribution, under the generic distributions table.

My understanding is that this was the reason we included the table in the first place, to differentiate from what is official Kubeflow and what isn't. We've put all the relevant warnings, so that users can redirect to distribution owners, if they choose to go with a distribution.

Even if a user goes with a cloud vendor's distro, they actually need a commercial relationship with that vendor to be able to spin up the infrastructure to execute the installation guides. So, it's hard for me to see why this distribution is special, and should be treated differently.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants