Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

arm64 support #227

Closed
jonwilliams84 opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #228
Closed

arm64 support #227

jonwilliams84 opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #228

Comments

@jonwilliams84
Copy link

Hi,
I am running a mixed architecture kubernetes cluster with some arm7 pi's, x86_64 and a jetson nano (arm64/aarch64). I have noticed that the image 'mcr.microsoft.com/k8s/csi/nfs-csi:latest' has no arm64 builds so while it pulls on the jetson nano, the container never comes up as it exits with:

$ kubectl -n kube-system logs pod/csi-nfs-node-sj52h nfs
standard_init_linux.go:207: exec user process caused "exec format error"

Do you know if there are any alternative images available / where I can grab the source code so I can build it locally on the nano?

Thanks,

Jon

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

arm64 is ready on latest image:

  "manifests": [
      {
         "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
         "size": 952,
         "digest": "sha256:5e8955ed92d0e7c32c78f4fb94dcdf366fb6ef5b902354acb5677ea19c576b78",
         "platform": {
            "architecture": "amd64",
            "os": "linux"
         }
      },
      {
         "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
         "size": 952,
         "digest": "sha256:94b804c2cb8fa6d434ce24fa87f820977de9aed529e869f366bc0f70873e5288",
         "platform": {
            "architecture": "arm",
            "os": "linux",
            "variant": "v7"
         }
      },
      {
         "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
         "size": 952,
         "digest": "sha256:28208401baf0036052008be4627461a72b44223ff5ce923e376e8d2894b7aa72",
         "platform": {
            "architecture": "arm64",
            "os": "linux"
         }
      }
   ]

andyzhangx added a commit to andyzhangx/csi-driver-nfs that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
670bb0e Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#229 from marosset/fix-codespell-errors
35d5e78 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#219 from yashsingh74/update-registry
63473cc Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#231 from coulof/bump-go-version-1.20.5
29a5c76 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#228 from mowangdk/chore/adopt_kubernetes_recommand_labels
8dd2821 Update cloudbuild image with go 1.20.5
1df23db Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#230 from msau42/prow
1f92b7e Add ginkgo timeout to e2e tests to help catch any stuck tests
2b8b80e fixing some codespell errors
c10b678 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#227 from coulof/check-sidecar-supported-versions
72984ec chore: adopt kubernetes recommand label
b055535 Header
bd0a10b typo
c39d73c Add comments
f6491af Script to verify EOL sidecar version
4133d1d Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#226 from msau42/cloudbuild
8d519d2 Pin buildkit to v0.10.6 to workaround v0.11 bug with docker manifest
6e04a03 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#224 from msau42/cloudbuild
26fdfff Update cloudbuild image
6613c39 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#223 from sunnylovestiramisu/update
0e7ae99 Update k8s image repo url
77e47cc Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#222 from xinydev/fix-dep-version
155854b Fix dep version mismatch
8f83905 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#221 from sunnylovestiramisu/go-update
1d3f94d Update go version to 1.20 to match k/k v1.27
901bcb5 Update registry k8s.gcr.io -> registry.k8s.io

git-subtree-dir: release-tools
git-subtree-split: 670bb0e
TerryHowe pushed a commit to TerryHowe/csi-driver-nfs that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2024
…rted-versions

Check CSI sidecar supported versions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants