Correct manifest path since the file name has been changed in previously ccommit

[vincent-pli]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @vincent-pli. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[Fei-Guo]

/approve
/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Fei-Guo, vincent-pli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• virtualcluster/OWNERS [Fei-Guo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[christopherhein]

Whoops, this is probably going to need more updates to work correctly, because the images aren't published anywhere this manifest will fail to be used for any cluster that you don't run make build-images and thus don't push those images into the kind or minikube cluster, it also requires CAPN which will require the user to do and follow the docs/README.md.

Given this isn't ready how should we handle the updates to this? Should we revert since you should be able to use VC w/o CAPN right now via the old readme, and then once we get #129 and #130 ?

[christopherhein]

@Fei-Guo @vincent-pli ^^^^

[Fei-Guo]

@christopherhein Yes. I think you overwrote the old all_in_one with all_in_one_capi? can you add the old all_in_one back and revert the README to the old all_in_one?

[christopherhein]

Oh shoot, wow. sorry I missed that, yea we can add that manifest back.