Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 fix: e2e changes to remove v1.23 #5297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

richardcase
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind failing-test

What this PR does / why we need it:

This changes the EKS upgrade test to use a newer version of Kubernetes. It was using v1.23 which isn't supported.

Also, removed old CSI tests as they where testing upgrades to v1.23 for unmanaged clusters.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emojis
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

Updates to e2e tests to stop using v1.23

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 21, 2025
@richardcase richardcase changed the title wip: e2e changes to remove v1.23 🐛 wip: e2e changes to remove v1.23 Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 21, 2025
@richardcase richardcase changed the title 🐛 wip: e2e changes to remove v1.23 🐛 fix: e2e changes to remove v1.23 Jan 21, 2025
@richardcase
Copy link
Member Author

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@richardcase: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-clusterclass
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance-with-ci-artifacts
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-gc
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-testing

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@richardcase
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@richardcase
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 21, 2025
@richardcase
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

This changes the EKS upgrade test to use a newer version of Kubernetes.
It was using v1.23 which isn't supported.

Removed old CSI tests as they where testing upgrades to v1.23
for unmanaged clusters.

Removed references to CoreDNS addon in EKS tests.

Signed-off-by: Richard Case <richard.case@outlook.com>
@richardcase
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

Copy link
Contributor

@AndiDog AndiDog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2025
@richardcase
Copy link
Member Author

/approve
/cherrypick release-2.7

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@richardcase: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-2.7 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/approve
/cherrypick release-2.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b29e04c into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 21, 2025
20 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@richardcase: new pull request created: #5310

In response to this:

/approve
/cherrypick release-2.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@richardcase
Copy link
Member Author

/cherrypick release-2.6

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@richardcase: #5297 failed to apply on top of branch "release-2.6":

Applying: fix: e2e changes to remove v1.23
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	test/e2e/data/e2e_conf.yaml
M	test/e2e/data/e2e_eks_conf.yaml
M	test/e2e/data/eks/cluster-template-eks-ipv6-cluster.yaml
M	test/e2e/shared/defaults.go
M	test/e2e/suites/managed/eks_ipv6_test.go
M	test/e2e/suites/managed/eks_legacy_test.go
M	test/e2e/suites/managed/eks_test.go
M	test/e2e/suites/managed/upgrade_test.go
M	test/e2e/suites/unmanaged/helpers_test.go
M	test/e2e/suites/unmanaged/unmanaged_functional_test.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging test/e2e/suites/unmanaged/unmanaged_functional_test.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/e2e/suites/unmanaged/unmanaged_functional_test.go
Auto-merging test/e2e/suites/unmanaged/helpers_test.go
Auto-merging test/e2e/suites/managed/upgrade_test.go
Auto-merging test/e2e/suites/managed/eks_test.go
Auto-merging test/e2e/suites/managed/eks_legacy_test.go
Auto-merging test/e2e/suites/managed/eks_ipv6_test.go
Auto-merging test/e2e/shared/defaults.go
Auto-merging test/e2e/data/eks/cluster-template-eks-ipv6-cluster.yaml
Auto-merging test/e2e/data/e2e_eks_conf.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/e2e/data/e2e_eks_conf.yaml
Auto-merging test/e2e/data/e2e_conf.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/e2e/data/e2e_conf.yaml
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 fix: e2e changes to remove v1.23

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-2.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants